1969 Corvette StingrayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
1969 Corvette StingrayNikon D70s ,Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG ASP HSM
1/800s f/8.0 at 14.0mm iso800 hand held Nikon D70s ,Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG ASP HSM 1/1000s f/8.0 at 23.0mm iso800 hand held my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Nice looking car! Is it yours?
I prefer the second image as I find the first shot has the car blending in too much with the dark background. The tighter second shot contrasts well with the stoney drive. Craig
What a HOT machine!! Love the second shot also. Just curious cause I'm still learning, but why did you use a high iso? Can you explain your settings?
Cheers, Jase. Jase - 'Motorcycle Gallery' - 'Car Gallery'
Wow... what a hot looking car. Awesome.
I especially like how you have managed to avoid photographing yourself in that glossy duco too. Well done I agree that the tighter crop is excellent, but the other image is good to give a perspective of the whole car. Nice work. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Kerry,
Great shots of a classic car. Who belongs to it? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for the kind comments, guys.
The car belongs to my neighbor. Jase: I used the higher ISO settings because the lighting was very erratic. It was a partly cloudy day, so the shot would be in full sunshine for a few minutes and then in full shade for a while. I didn't have the luxury of waiting only for the sunshine shots. I finally ended up using the sb800 to help even out the exposures. Steve: Avoiding the self-portrait was quite a challenge and I wasn't able to do it in all of the various shots. Mostly, I tried to stay in shady areas or at an angle to the car which reduced or eliminated the problem. For those shots where I couldn't avoid it, the clone tool was my friend. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|