Three new shots to chew on...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Three new shots to chew on...

Postby deapee on Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:52 pm

Image

Image

Image

Thanks for looking, I hope you enjoyed them.
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby DanielA on Sat Aug 13, 2005 3:39 pm

Very nice, deapee.

I like #1, but can't say why. Did you add an effect, or was it raining?

#2 I'm not that keen on.

#3 is very nice. I'd crop off the empty sky at the top.


Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby moggy on Sat Aug 13, 2005 3:54 pm

Very nice, I particularly liked #3. I would agree with Daniel about cropping some of the sky in #3.
:wink: Bob.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby the foto fanatic on Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:14 pm

I like 'em all. Maybe you could try the cropping as suggested and see whether you like the change. :)
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby deapee on Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:24 am

Thanks.
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby chris1968 on Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:29 am

deapee - love the shots, glad to see its not only sunny olde englade that getting the rain.

love #3 but too much sky for me - just wondered if it possible to retake with either less sky or a slight zoom in so the river runs diagonally through the shot - for me i think it would be a nice juxtaposition of the quiet river versus the busy (ie brightly lit) city?
in the beginning was the word, and the word was Aardvark......
User avatar
chris1968
Member
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Dark Side of the Moors. West Yorks. England.....D70

Postby nat on Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:58 am

Hi there deapee,
There is definately something about number one that makes you stare at it....but like DanielA.....I can't work out why.
I'm afraid number two doesn't grab my attention quite as much.
My initial impression of the Pittsburgh shot was that cropping some of the sky would improve the shot, but I have changed my mind. The colour transition through the sky, subtle as it is, helps the photo. Just by crolling down the screen to get a cropped effect, I felt the photo lost some of its depth by removing the sky. IMHO - leave it as it is. I really like it.
Last edited by nat on Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
User avatar
nat
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Gawler, South Australia

Postby deapee on Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:43 am

Thanks for the comments.

As far as composition on numero 3, the city shot, I was out on a lookout and it's all trees from about a foot out of the frame on down...and if I zoom in, I feel I loose something because I'll lose the part of the river that is in the lower part of the frame...There are different vantage points I will consider looking at in the future...or maybe when the trees die heh.
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:01 am

deapee - #1 & 2 are really sombre and I like very much the effect, and if I had to pick a fav, it would be #2 :D
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:38 am

I like all three shots and definitely wouldn't alter #3 for reasons already stated - it loses scale when cropped.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Heath Bennett on Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:41 am

All awesome for me
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby deapee on Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:06 pm

Thanks guys, I really appreciate the time. Your feedback is very helpful.
D70 | Nikkor 18-70 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8D ED | Nikkor 85 1.8D | Nikkor 50 1.8D | SB-600
User avatar
deapee
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Postby meicw on Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:47 pm

Great shots. My prerference is no 2

Regards
meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby paulvdb1 on Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:29 pm

I like #1 because there's action in it to give some sense of movement. For me #2 loses out as a result of zero action and a tilt that's not quite enough to be arty.
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Postby mudder on Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:54 pm

Really like the mood you've captured in the first two well done, the first grabs my attention more, in the second I'd be tempted to clone out the moon(?) and just leave the sky blank... Nice and moody... Although I keep leaning over a bit when viewing the second one :wink:

I agree with the others about cropping a "bit off the top" in the skyline shot, that'd make a good pano...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques