Page 1 of 1

Kitty

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 10:55 pm
by kipper
Taken with my Sigma 70-300mm 1:4-5.6D APO Super Macro.

ISO: 200
WB: Incandencant
Color: sRGB
Metering: Matrix
Shutter: 6"
Aperture: F5.6
Mode: Manual
Focal Length: 300 (switched to macro, couldn't get it to focus without at smaller focal lengths)
Flash: None
Date/Time: 26/11/2004 @ 10.45

Think I had the exp. meter about 1/3 to 2/3 steps positive. Used a couple of coasters on the carpet to get the lense at the correct height. Set it to timer mode to reduce vibration. Bit of photoshop level and color adjustment. Due to the two incandescant lamps in pink lampshades giving the picture an overall pink tinge.

<img src="http://members.iinet.net.au/~darryl_m/Kitty.jpg" width=1024>

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:27 am
by Killakoala
It's a cat!!!

It's posing for you.

In fact, i reckon it's a professional model.

Although the photo seems a bit on the soft side. Did you run it through a blur filter to give it that 'soft focus' look to get more 'cuteness' out of your subject?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:30 am
by gstark
Killakoala wrote:Did you run it through a blur filter to give it that 'soft focus' look to get more 'cuteness' out of your subject?


Steve,

No, It was a Sigma lens. :)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:30 am
by fozzie
kipper,

I thought I saw a puddyat, I did, I did.

Pretty puddytat. :)


Cheers,

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:51 am
by kipper
What gstark said :)

I'm gathering then the Sigma lenses tend to be on the soft focus side of things?


I did do a smaller version that I just sent via email to my sister with a sharpen filter applied to give more detail to the cats fur.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 10:10 am
by gstark
kipper wrote:What gstark said :)

I'm gathering then the Sigma lenses tend to be on the soft focus side of things?


I don't like 'em. Personal opinion only, but I've seen some soft, and some sharp, images from Sigmas.

But generally, my impression has been that build quality seems to tend towards Hyundai rather than Benz. Given choice of Tamron or Sigma, Tamron seem better, but again, we only have Nikkor glass in this household. :)

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 10:16 am
by kipper
I'm half considering packing up my F80 with Nikkor 28-70 and the Sigma 70-300 APO Super Macro and selling it on eBay. Then with the proceeds get either the 70-200VR or 80-400VR.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:02 pm
by phillipb
Hey Kipper, If you decide to sell the sigma let me know how much you want for if, it will go well with my Hyundai.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:15 pm
by sirhc55
Remember the old adage - a hyundai will get you from A to B the same as a Rolls.

If you like the lens you are using - no matter the make - then use it with pride - and also remember that anyone can have the best gear in the world but that does not make them a good photographer!!

Cheers

Chris

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:22 pm
by phillipb
By the way Kipper, I was being serious, I really do have a Hyundai and I would prefer to have the Sigma 70-300 to my Nikkor 75-240.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:27 pm
by kipper
Well I have the 70-300MM G in my collection today, picked up for $240. Could of got it cheaper but hey I was in Teds and it was cheaper than Vanbar so I decided what the heck. What I'll do is play with both lenses and decided which I like the most. The loser gets to go into the F80 kit that I'm going to sell.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:30 pm
by Greg B
Love the shot kipper, I think that cats can look better with a little softness in the shot.

What's the moggie's name?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:37 pm
by kipper
Tosca, my sister named him after an Italian Opera :)
He looks cuter when he hasn't been bitten on the nose and he's in sunlight as he has lovely jade colored eyes.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:01 pm
by gstark
sirhc55 wrote:Remember the old adage - a hyundai will get you from A to B the same as a Rolls.


That isn't quite true.

As soon as you encounter a difficult road situation - a corner that tightens up, or a vehicle traversing your path - the primary safety features that the Rolls (Alfa, Benz, BMW, Citroen, Porsche, Renault,, Volvo, VW) have will help you to drive through and out of that danger situation - possibly saving your life.

Hyundai doesn't come close when it comes to primary safety, and I would much rather avoid an accident situation than become involved in one.

You still need to know how to drive car, though.

If you like the lens you are using - no matter the make - then use it with pride - and also remember that anyone can have the best gear in the world but that does not make them a good photographer!!


This, of course, is very true.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:02 pm
by gstark
phillipb wrote:By the way Kipper, I was being serious, I really do have a Hyundai and I would prefer to have the Sigma 70-300 to my Nikkor 75-240.


I have a 1969 Alfa 1750 GTV, and a 1972 Alfa GTV 2000. They go perfectly with ny Nikkormat FTn.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:03 pm
by gstark
kipper wrote:Tosca, my sister named him after an Italian Opera


Our cat, on the rare occasions he deigns us with his presence, is named Vivaldi.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:27 pm
by sirhc55
Hi Gary

I did not say anything about safety et al - all I said is that both will get you from A to B which still stands true.

Cheers

Chris

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:16 pm
by gstark
sirhc55 wrote:Hi Gary

I did not say anything about safety et al - all I said is that both will get you from A to B which still stands true.


Actually, Chris, you said that both will get you from A to B "the same".

Had you not qualified your statement, I'd agree. You did qualify it however, and I therefore cannot agree. :)

Cheerz.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 8:21 pm
by Dargan
Glad to see you included the Volvo Gary.