Macro + SB 800 = Ugly SpiderModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Macro + SB 800 = Ugly Spiderhttp://www.pixspot.com/displayimage.php?album=14&pos=4
Ugly bugger, but we parted friends. Me to continue cleaning out the garage, him/her to catch flies and make the world a better place. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Great shot mate
I wonder if he could see you, I’d hate to be paying for his glasses!!!!!!! He’d get on well with my butterfly (for a while) Cheers Ray >> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
Re: Macro + SB 800 = Ugly Spider
nice shot greg... which lens? http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Thanks guys.
It is the Tamron 70-300 macro xerubus. I lust a 60 or 105 Nikon micro, but it is possible to get decent results with the Tamron if I make an effort. Someone else here, can't remember who, did some good macro stuff with it and the SB800 just the other day, I need to get my PP skills honed too - this looked lighter in PS CS (as did my damn Tree in the comp). Obviously, I am doing something wrong, need to get that nailed down Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Hey Greg
Me too, my photo came out a little on the dark side as well compared to PS CS. I think it hurt as the bottom of my tree is simply too dark. THis is a great picture though. Man (s)he's ugly. I wonder if he/she realizes it?
Probably not dooda, in my experience , spiders are lacking in self awareness.
What is going on with PS CS and the darkness/lightness issue? I am puzzled. But the truth must be found! Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Thanks Photodude.
I was at around the minimum focussing distance for 300mm in macro, maybe three or four feet or thereabouts (120cm ish). Not really sure. No tripod, hand held with the SB-800 and 1/500 shutter speed I think. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|