Some Bird shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some Bird shotsTaken with the 70-300mm G lens, 1 & 2 with the aid of the SB800. Cropped a bit in PS...
http://sheepie.smugmug.com/gallery/267498 *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Good stuff sheepie. The first guy looks like he is a Canon bird, marvelling at your fine equipment
Nice colours on #2 also. Yep, despite the obvious fact that your 70-300 is giving you fabulous results, you definitely need some outrageously expensive additional lens immediately. No worries. And a new bag to carry it. And a filter. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Good shots sheepie, you said you used the flash on the first 2, how far away was you when you took these shots, and if you was a fair way does the flash really make a differance over that distance?
Big Flash Dummy here John BBJ D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
In both, I reckon I was maybe five or six metres away at most, so the flash certainly made a difference. I think that it has helped render the colours a bit better, with higher contrast than I would have got in the available light. In the second one, you can see the reflection of the flash light on the wires. I think with a bit more experience, the first one would have helped the bird stand out from the background a little better - not quite there at the moment, but close Thanks for the feedback all
Fantastic pics Sheepie. Such vivid colours.
Did these birds visit your garden or did you have to visit them? Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
They were around the neighbourhood up at Old Bar (just out of Taree) - we spent Christmas there with the In-Laws. The Black Cockatoos have been terrorising the local trees for a couple of weeks now, while the kookaburra and others just hang around hoping to find some food!
sexy birds ...nice shots.
I envy you for the black Cockatoo. Cheers CD
G'day,
Sheepie, #1 is a cracker! He's watching you take the shot... Nice with a bit of foliage and flowers etc. in the shot to make it very natural... Geees, it's hard typing after a few reds... It's taken me three goes to upt in the dots! Damn, I'll give up now.... Jealous of the Black Cocky, they're not common so thanks for that one! Cheers, Mudder Aka Andrew
Sheepie
The kookaburra is almost similar to one I took 20 years ago on good old Tri-x and have sepia-toned and framed on the wall. It's one of my favourite prints. Spooky! Your other birds are great, but look a little contrasty on my monitor. Are you slightly over-popping them in post processing? Do other forum members see them as slightly contrasty? Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|