Gold Coast Snaps

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Gold Coast Snaps

Postby leek on Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:25 pm

....
Last edited by leek on Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:00 pm

Hi Leek

I like the two pics of footprints. The interesting point about ASICS is that it looks like it is pillow embossed i.e. coming out of the sand rather than being depressed. BTW what lens did you use - the kit lens?

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby leek on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:06 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Hi Leek
I like the two pics of footprints. The interesting point about ASICS is that it looks like it is pillow embossed i.e. coming out of the sand rather than being depressed. BTW what lens did you use - the kit lens?
Chris


I also noticed the embossed effect once I had uploaded it...

All photos were with the standard 18-70 lens...
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:06 pm

Nice photos there Leek. I especially like the helicopter and the footprint, although it looks strangely familiar......
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby leek on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:13 pm

Oops... Did I inadvertantly copy a photo of yours??? or do you have the same corn on your foot???
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:15 pm

Nah, not one of mine, but i am sure i've seen it somewhere else, not sure where......will check..... :D
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby bwhinnen on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:16 pm

I too like the 'embossed' look of the asics print. And the footprints look good as well...

Did you walk backwards out of the sea to get that one?

Good work, would love to see more of it.

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby leek on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:23 pm

bwhinnen wrote:Did you walk backwards out of the sea to get that one?


No... I ran backwards and then knelt down quickly b4 the next wave came in... :lol:
Last edited by leek on Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:27 pm

Found out why it looked familiar.

http://www.pixspot.com/displayimage.php ... at=0&pos=0

If you click on the link above you should notice that two pics to the right is the footprint pic. This is a link to RAYDAR's pixspot site, but if you click on the footprint, it is your photos. Hmmmm, a pixspot anomly... :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:32 pm

The embossed effect is an optical illusion. If you rotate the footprint 90 degrees counter clockwise then look at it for awhile it will suddenly sink into the sand. The same effect can be gotten if you photograph the moon and rotate the photograph 180 degrees.
I should add that it's very difficult to create an illusion like this and the fact you've done it so early on with your D70 means you deserve to be congratulated.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby leek on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:40 pm

Killakoala wrote:Hmmmm, a pixspot anomaly... :)


Not really an anomaly... Raydar's link gives you the last few photos to be uploaded (which should change constantly)... He/she should probably have used this link:
http://www.pixspot.com/thumbnails.php?album=100
size=18][/size]
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Kristine on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:46 pm

Hi Leek

Nice Photos :-) Thanks for sharing.

From viewing your helicopter and roller coaster images, it looks like you have one or two dust bunnies on your CCD.

Cheers
Kristine
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:51 pm

I too noticed that the image was the same as Raydars. A glitch in posting no doubt. Which brings me to a feature in Photoshop that many of you may not be aware of....if you have two similar images and you are not sure if they are the same image...or simply similar...you can find out this way. Copy one of the images...Select All/Copy and paste it on top of the other image. Then go to Layers/blend mode/difference. This mode will examine the top pixel and compare it to the pixel beneath it. If they are exactly the same the filter will cancel them out and display a black pixel. If the 2 images are exactly the same then a pure black image will be displayed. If any pixel differs then this will be shown in a colour that intensifies in relation to how different they are. This means that if someone takes one of your images and makes any change to it you can pick up where the changes occur. If only 5 pixels have been changed in any way the filter will reveal this.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby leek on Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:06 am

Kristine wrote:From viewing your helicopter and roller coaster images, it looks like you have one or two dust bunnies on your CCD.


OK Kristine, You're talking to a complete beginner here... What's a dust bunny? and where on my photos is it???

Cheers,
Leek
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Kristine on Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:09 am

Hi Leek

A dust bunny is basically a speck of dust that has lodged itself onto the sensor of your camera (dust bunny is a nick name). It is not a big drama; everyone eventually gets them and they are easy to get rid of by using a blower or you can grab some eclipse cleaning solution and give your sensor a wipe over (see Birddog about this).

Here is a link to an article which will explain a bit better:
http://www.bythom.com/cleaning.htm

If you want further information on this, just let me know. :-)
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby stark23x on Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:00 pm

I had what can only be called a dust python right out of the box. Looked like a big black snake. I bought this kit and it has worked like a charm!

leek, I can see the bunny in your coaster image:

Image

They will show up often when you shoot the sky.
stark23x
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:47 pm

Postby leek on Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:07 pm

Yep I spotted it soon after Kristine's post and it has been annoying me ever since... I can't see a thing on the sensor - even under bright light, but I guess it would be pretty small... I'll try a blower first and then the kit you mentioned if that doesn't work...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby gstark on Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:58 am

Leek,

Are you looking for it (on the sensor) in the correct location?

Remember that its location will be inverted and reversed relative to where it appears to be in your images.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby leek on Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:43 am

gstark wrote:Are you looking for it (on the sensor) in the correct location?

I examined the whole sensor with a Petzl headlamp on my forehead and couldn't see anything... But I'll have another go tonight...
Could it be on the lens rather than the sensor???

Thanks for all the help...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques