Ebor falls comparison - slow vs fast shutter
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:09 am
Finally had a play with slower shutter speeds at Ebor Falls, halfway between Coffs Harbour and Armidale. Nice spot, with choice of the upper falls (these pics) and lower falls. The upper falls are fairly short, but close to the viewing platform. The lower falls are a higher drop, but much further from their viewing platform.
These two pics are pretty much of the same area and the same settings, except I varied the shutter speed. The more observant of you are wondering why I didn't change the aperture or sensitivity to give the same exposure. The answer is because the slower pic looked overexposed. Or it could be because I just missed it. One of those.
Kit lens, f/29, ISO200, 70mm & 1/50 sec (293kB)
Kit lens, f/29, ISO200, 70mm & 1/15 sec (253kB)
Which one do you prefer, and why?
These two pics are pretty much of the same area and the same settings, except I varied the shutter speed. The more observant of you are wondering why I didn't change the aperture or sensitivity to give the same exposure. The answer is because the slower pic looked overexposed. Or it could be because I just missed it. One of those.
Kit lens, f/29, ISO200, 70mm & 1/50 sec (293kB)
Kit lens, f/29, ISO200, 70mm & 1/15 sec (253kB)
Which one do you prefer, and why?