Overexposed portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Overexposed portraits

Postby wendellt on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:49 am

I think correct exposure and an appealing end result are both relative things

This series of portraits shot with the nikkor 85mm f1.4 used high iso and slower shutterspeeds to blow out the skin and background which gives the overall image a certain mood, also fixes up blemishes and dark spots on the face.
I fiddled with the white balance to get these as white as possible

this one has been smoothed out in photoshoip due to banding(jpeg images)
Image

look at at that delicious creamy bokeh!

Image

shot wide open at f1.4, you can see the softness, but for portraiture it's a good soft
Image

Image

this image shows the correct exposure and white balance
Image
.
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby owen on Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:26 am

Very nice photos Wendell, and I agree that the overexposed look suits them very well.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Oscar on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:05 am

Nice shots Wendell. #1 has a spacey feel to it. I like #2 and #4 for the soft natural look the exposure has given them. Cheers, Mick
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby Slider on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:31 am

Great stuff Wendell :D Love the 3rd
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby Geoff on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:42 am

Brilliant again Wendell. #3 is my pic :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Greg B on Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:44 am

Great shots wendell, number 3 is my favourite shot too, but the girl in #2 is seriously cute :shock:
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Link on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:12 am

Waw, nice series...

Number 1 doesn't really work because the overexp erases her face 'frame' just up the model's left eye.

Number 2 has great skin tone and is really nice except for this bit of strong reflection in the model's right eye.

My fav is definitely number 3 - warm white balance, slight overexp, and the way the model looks outside the frame; it all conveys a strong moody atmosphere.

Regarding number 4, I like the "non-natural" ones, it makes the model's blue eyes stand out.

Generally speaking I like to overexp portraits too for exactly the same reasons you mentioned - fixing skin blemishes and dark spots... However, I'm pretty sure that top-notch professional results requires quite a bit of post-processing!

Link.
User avatar
Link
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Nowra

Postby myarhidia on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:13 am

Hi Wendell,
with #1 I think a much tighter crop would be more appropriate, it looks as if she has gorrilla arms in proportion to her face, however love the way you captured her eyes.
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
User avatar
myarhidia
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:24 am

Top pics as usual Wendell. I think the most important factor in 1,2 and 4 are the eyes. Lovely, sharp and mesmerising that you forget there are other elements in the pic :)

#3 is very nostalgic - one of your traits and styles I've noticed in some of your pics.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby admajic on Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:43 pm

As usual Wendell, great images of great women. This sharpness on the eyes is outstanding. Im already in love with no. 2. How can we meet her :twisted:
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby robw25 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:03 pm

what a beauty #2 is !!!!!!!!

wendell well done

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia

Postby stormygirl on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:53 pm

Pure magic again Wendell! Love them all.
Weather and Photography Web Site

http://www.stormygirl.net
User avatar
stormygirl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Portraits

Postby zafra52 on Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:55 pm

Thery are excellent portraits Wendellt. You've done a great job!
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4861
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Six on Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:44 pm

Wow, they are all excellent, I actually quite like #1, with those eyes and the expression she has. #3 is very good too, maby a bit too soft?
Six
Member
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: Lilyfield, Sydney

Postby digitor on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:04 pm

Number 2 does it for me - (what it does, I won't say :lol: ) the eyes have it!

#3 has a nice dreamy quality, too. Well done (again)

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby Matt. K on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:06 pm

Wendell
You learn very quickly! :D :D
Nice work! All you need now are some attractive models! :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby wendellt on Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:19 pm

thankyou everyone

still comfortable on headshots even though im briefed to take full length to include the fashion!

I still get those full length shots but somehow doesn't look as nice as a tight shot
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby mudder on Mon Aug 21, 2006 8:55 pm

Wendell I always enjoy your stuff...

The first one is captivating, seems dreamy soft (although I'm not sure, the arms seems "bigger" or something? Effect from close-up?), The second almost seems floating it's so seperated from the background and love the tones in #3... Great stuff...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby asaroha on Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:16 pm

Love #2 and #3! :D

Phone number ?
User avatar
asaroha
Member
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: Sydney CBD

Postby Yi-P on Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:18 am

Love #3's mood and #2's creamy taste!!

Now Im even more attracted to this lens :P
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques