First Time Model Pics

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First Time Model Pics

Postby MattyO on Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:58 pm

I was helping out with a mates Portfolio Shoot, and i took these with my 50mm f/1.8. First time doing something like this. But what do you think?

Image
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by MattyO on Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Geoff on Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:13 am

Matty - these are of high quality and you should be proud! Composition, exposure and teh general 'feel' for the images is spot on. If you refer to the FAQ we aim to keep the number of images per post to just 4 and below, so that our member with dialup aren't flogged. Just so you know for next time. I hope to see a lot more of your help with your mate!! :D
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Manta on Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:36 am

Hi Matty.

Good work overall - great for a first effort!

A few little niggles for me though. I feel there's a tad too much shadow on the model's face in the first shot, the low-riding jeans hanging under the crotch in the second do nothing to flatter the girl's shape and, to me, the guy's face seems slightly out of focus in the last one.

Shots 3 and 4 are rippers - beautifully lit and well composed.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby MattyO on Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:57 pm

Thanks Manta,

Is there anything i could do to change the shadow level in photoshop? The sun postion really wasn't ideal, maybe i should have use some fill flash. However i struggled a bit with the fill flash on my sb600, it seems to overpower the shot a bit too much.

I do have some better shots, however this was my mates photoshoot for her portfolio, so I wont be able to put them all up.
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Oscar on Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:27 pm

#1 would have looked much better with some falsh fill (as Manta said).

#2 the whole shot seems a little out - I don't like the messy background, again flash fill required for the shadows, not sure if it is the jeans or the background but the crotch area certainly looks peculiar.

#3 Like this one and the background seems to fit better.

#4 really good shot IMHO

#5 looks cool too.

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby Manta on Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:24 am

MattyO wrote:Thanks Manta,

Is there anything i could do to change the shadow level in photoshop? The sun postion really wasn't ideal, maybe i should have use some fill flash. However i struggled a bit with the fill flash on my sb600, it seems to overpower the shot a bit too much.

I do have some better shots, however this was my mates photoshoot for her portfolio, so I wont be able to put them all up.


Matty - you can always dial down the ev on the flash, 2/3 to a 1 stop might work well, depending on how close you are to your subject. You could also bracket flash values - your manual is your friend.

As far as Photoshop is concerned, try selecting the area then Image/Adjustments/Shadow&Highlight. Experimentation here may give good results. (nb - if you feather the selection by ..say.. 5 pixels or so, there won't be as obvious a 'line' showing where you've done the work) :lol:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby cawdor on Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:01 pm

I like number 4 the best, the light is great and it's an overall beautiful shot.
I feel that number 3 and 5, whilst technically great, the setup of the photos could have been improved. The models just stand in a large room and when I look at the photos it feels as if the people don't belong there, the space around them is too big....it's kinda hard to describe :)
It works for shot 1 because the background is very blurred and the model is right at the front - there's a viewing flow from front to back. 3 and 5 don't have that flow...I know it probably doesn't make much sense, but hey I'm trying hard to describe it :)

Otherwise very well done, like I said before, number 4 does it for me.
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
cawdor
Member
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Laurie on Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:26 pm

nice photos.
solme of the shadows are a little harsh but if thats what you were after then it was well effected.
cute models too
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Aussie Dave on Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:11 pm

Matty
A good effort under these testing conditions. I'd echo what Manta has suggested. Another alternative is to take your tripod (assuming you have one) and give the SB600 a go remotely, using the D70 on-board flash in "commander-mode".

You could then try putting the SB600 into manual mode & play with the power settings and distances you have the flash from your subject.

After a bit of trial & error, you'll soon see what lighting looks good and then go for it.... You may still choose to leave some shadow showing, but you can be in full control of how much light is being output, thus controlling how dark (or light) the shadows appear.
By taking the flash off-camera, you can easily put the flash closer to the subject than you normally could, if you left it on top of the D70. Remember, flash to subject distance is of great importance in flash photography (or at least that's what I keep reading) :lol:

It's all a learning curve.... :)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby MattyO on Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:44 pm

Thank you everyone, if i get invited back i will have a shot at using the sb600 off camera. Never really thought about it while doing the shoot.

My mate chose the location, and makeup and wardrobe and i just squeezed the shutter button, and kept out of her way. I think she was going for the "out of place" look, im not sure.

Using manual flash intimidates me a bit, as i don't know how to set the camera exposure and flash exposure together to get a good result, it all seems like a lot of trial and error, which was something i didnt' have the time for.
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby MattyO on Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:41 am

Image
Image

I tried to fix this one up.... not sure how well i did, but its definately an improvement.
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Manta on Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:20 am

Perhaps a little too lightened now Matty - about 3/4 of of what you've done here would probably be about right.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques