1. Booderee botanical gardens (ID anyone?)

2. Using a piece of red lighting gel then B&W conversion...

3.

4. Spider's web reflecting the last rays of sunlight

Booderee - my favsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Booderee - my favsI posted the themes, however my favourites are really single images that really only fit the theme of a great weekend camping...
1. Booderee botanical gardens (ID anyone?) ![]() 2. Using a piece of red lighting gel then B&W conversion... ![]() 3. ![]() 4. Spider's web reflecting the last rays of sunlight ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Justin
#1 and #4 are good (I think #1 is a waratah), but #2 needs a better, harsher B & W for me and #3 suffers from not being a compelling enough subject. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Justin
#2 works for me. It's such a dreamy seascape and draws me in. Lovely image. That's art. I disagree with Peter on the P-processing and think you got the balance right. I know Peter like more drama....but he just has to pander to his gentler side on this one. Regards
Matt. K
the B&W is a sunrise shot and I've titled it 'Dark to Light' (in my usual pragmatic titling fashion) but that may have helped to reflect what I was trying to achieve here. I have plenty of colour versions of this a lot of contrast and they did not have the same feel...
The other issue of course is there is so little range in the pixels that any more contrast just blows the highlights right out. ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Hmm realised I wasn't doing any favours posting that.
I've gone hard in the PP here ya go! ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Justin
I actually prefer the first colour version rather than the high sat one. My problem with the B & W was the detail was hard to make out, but as Matt suggests I like more drama ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Hi Peter was just getting carried away with the pictures I think I started on a tangent once I opened up the colour version I then wanted to see what I could do with it... sigh...
![]() ![]() ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
interesting thought here though - I posted the first colour one in my picture-a-day gallery it had only a couple of hits before I deleted it. The second one thumbnails a lot better and has had heaps more hits and even attracted comments.
So it's not about how good yr photos look large, its how good they look small ![]() Nick - I agree - I was just thinking it would be great to have a 'rollback everything I did 'cos I forgot, by about 20%' button in photoshop ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
#1 for me all the way.
![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|