Sharpest image I've taken.. no idea how I managed to do this..
What do you think?
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
PuppyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Link didn't work for me until I renamed the link
http://kris.dingo.net.au/Test/puppy.JPG http://kris.dingo.net.au/Test/puppy.jpg With the kit lens that is exceptionaly sharp, the lighting is good, it is so sharp becuase of the shallow depth of field, nice work. Not sure if the crop should have been closer or not, it seems to work well however with the frame ending at the chest with the rest of the dog (big puppy) fading out in the back 2/3 of the photo. I like it.
Dude, you've so gotta resize to 800 pixels or under width when posting on this board... just a friendly reminder!
Otherwise, nice picture and cute dog! Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
G'day,
Really sharp, wonder whether it might be worth cropping to make it a portrait aspect to lose the blurry (happy) tail and isolate the happy face? I tried it on a jpeg I saved on the PC and it seems to really isolate that happy expression... Burnese Mountain dog? Absolutely gorgeous... I love big cuddly dogs... And he looks so happy Makes me miss my old fella...
Cheers, Mudder Aka Andrew
Hey there,
I like the shot, I like the framing with the wagging tail, I think it adds a sense of playfullness to the shot. The one thing I'd focus on improving here is the blown out highlights along the nose between the eyes. You lose a lot of details there... that's all I've got.. PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions <a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
it was a fluke
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
