New macroModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nice
I may have left the border off. What lens are you using. Winter is ending in California and stuff is starting to Bloom
I agree with the previous post.. although it's a nice border I don't think it works as well as a simpler border may have in this situation..
Three things, none of them shot related.. 1) The image dimensions are probably a bit big for inserting into the forum ( I would have probably linked to it ) 2) The image size is quite small <100k - This saves us time in downloading but it looks to me like the compression has taken an awful lot of detail out of the shot.. or possibly... 3) If it's not Jpeg compression.. was there a lot of PP sharpening done? I thnk it's the jpeg compression i'm seeing.. Back to the shot.. what kind of flower is that? It looks quite alien.. PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions <a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
Oneputt,
The Nikon 60mm f/2.8 D 'Micro' is an excellent lens. Nice shot, but I would have selected a plain border, a bit too busy for me. Was this the lens on e-bay (Ex Adelaide) or through you know who... . Cheers, fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
I got it from a pro on the Coast. He was switching to Cannon as a result of some dispute with Maxwells (the Nikon Distributor in this neck of the woods).
Platinum Weaver I have struck this compression problem when converting before. What process should I follow to avoid it. Using Photshop CS.
I like the border, no in fact, I love it!! It's very fresh and innovative. Most borders are based on real life paints, this is distinctively digital! It's like a border without a real hard defined edge, even though it has the framed line, the blurring of details from within the pic I think it works well.
What aperture was it taken at? Cos I'm seeing some black spots in there that could be telltale sign of the not so friendly bunnies.
Certainly looks like dust bunnies to me. I agree with Onyx on the frame - I really like the way you have used the pic to form the frame - innovative Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|