Handheld pano shot of Fareham CreekModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Handheld pano shot of Fareham CreekWhile I was in the UK I took this portrait pano shot of Fareham Creek. I didn't have a tripod while I was there so I had to make do without. Only one fault that I've noticed is with the masts of the boat. There is ghosting there and is either to do with being handheld, or more probably the slight rolling of the boats between shots. Which would become apparently when Panorama Factory overlaps and blends.
<img src="http://www.morganpost.com/FarehamCreek.jpg">
Love the light in this pano kipper and even tho’ you have pointed out the masts problem I don’t believe it is anything to worry too much about. BTW - this pic is of Fareham Inlet - we don’t have creeks in the UK
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
My sincere apologies kipper - I used to go to Fareham on my holidays when I was but a sprout and always thought it was Inlet - I must be thinking of somewhere else. Still it is a great pic Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Great effort for a low light hand-held multi exposure image. I see the duplicate mast, it's very minor detail and could be cloned out of the shot easily. 10 / 10 top effort.
Shoot early - Shoot often
Great Pano Kipper... Make's me feel quite homesick for a place where they have tides of more than a metre...
Handheld is the way to go... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I don't think it appeared that dark when I took the shot because it was about 10am in the morning. Although being winter it is darker then normal. Maybe my exposure settings was 1-stop under.
The only thing I did to this image in PS is duplicate the image layer, desaturate, invert, make the layer a soft light and dropped the layer to about 40%. I always find that this helps to bring out more contrast in the sky and give the foreground if underexposed (in my case it was) a bit more detail. It also made the orange in the sky more intense. I don't always do it, but I found it worked in this case.
Yep, I'm very homesick for England at the moment. Really considering going back there to live. Something I really have noticed since I've been back in Australia, and don't get me wrong I love Australia. I think it has a lot to offer - cheap housing, cheap food, cheap dining out, lifestyle, cheap camera gear etc. However I went to work today which is about 15-20km (50min by bus) from where I live. In all that journey I didn't see one thing that I wanted to photograph - not one!
The photograph in this photo I took going from where I was staying to my nans house. All of 5min up the road from where I was staying, and 1min from a reasonable size town. Perhaps I'm just biased but I find it difficult to find anything worth shooting here unless I travel atleast 1-1.5hr away from my home eg. Cape Schanck, Stoney Point, Queenscliff Lighthouse, Aireys Inlet, Dandenong Rainforest etc. Wheres Europe there always seemed to be a photographic opportunity just around the corner.
Interesting comments.
I know what you mean. But remember that the UK is more compact and has a lot more in it than Australia, that's why you have to travel so far to see anything worth shooting here (landscape-wise). If you look really hard i'm sure you'll find something to photograph. I know what you mean though. Living in Ryde as i do, i find it hard to find anything interesting to photograph here, but if i travel just one suburb, to somewhere i don't live or normally go to, then i find things to photograph. It might be that you are used to seeing the same things day-in, day-out and it's just not inspirational enough for you anymore. Then again, i assume you live in Melbourne so that might also be a major factor in not finding anything interesting (Just kidding, there's a lot of interesting things in Melb) Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I know what you mean kipper as I to miss the prolification of object matter that Europe offers. But, in saying that, I believe that Australia offers thousands of photograph opportunities, you just have to look a little harder
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|