SimplicityModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
SimplicityHey,
Thanks for looking.......the objective was simple lighting and moody images....yes her face is meant to be shaded in part..... Just tonal adjustments and spot cloning here and there....pretty 'simple' really... Cheers Dan
....... love the tattoo...... the images are nice as well
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Nice poses, nice skintones and i like the lighting too. Looks like an excellent session
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
The lighting looks really good, however, the bikini looks like it has been completely blocked out.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Thanks guys...yeah you may be right.....i think i did go a little overboard....well thats why i post em here Dan
that is hot, great model! i love how the lighting follows the curves of her body , well done
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
#1 could use some eye contact looking throught her hair if it was hanging kinda like in #2 with a bit of a gap.
#4 on my monitor her Bikini top looks like its been drawn on. It looks 2D on a 3D Body All good, but #3 is my pic. PS is ment to be a blondish type joke? Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
#3 is a great shot.
I think #2 is spoiled by the unflattering lines caused by the pulling of the strap. I'm not a fan of the horizontal poses. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
very nice Dan, pleased to see the other images from this set.
Love the pose of the first, but would love to see it in the color of the last. nice stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|