i haven't been around here for a while... but some photos

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

i haven't been around here for a while... but some photos

Postby jamesw on Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:54 am

yeah guys, haven't been around for a while. combination of getting a promotion at work (meaning i actually do work now, which is a good thing :lol:) and the weather being good (meaning that i'm out riding so much more, as well as shooting lots of photos!)

here are a few i really like and would like some other opinions on.

Image

Image

Image
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby bwhinnen on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:03 am

I like the second and third! The first seems to be lacking something, but I cannot put my finger on it.

I like how you've got the crew sitting just in frame on the second, and the wide angle perspective on the third!

Good to see you back!
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby BT*ist on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:16 am

Very dramatic shots! I particularly like the shadows on the wall of the first (maybe increase contrast further?) the wide angle of the second (increase saturation/contrast?). The third maybe increase brightnes/midtones?
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby jamesw on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:38 am

thanks for the feedback.

i might add that i did very little PP for these, so the comments are especially appriciated!

i think all i did was fix WB and convert from raw. not sure if i even sharpened them. they were just for a website/blog i do (blog.ugzine.com if your interested) so i was a bit slack!
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby ozimax on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:48 am

Good to see you back James, your photos are always good, different and enjoyable to view!

Ozi
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:51 am

Good to see you back and posting some shots James, I like the last the most of these but they all have something cool or unusual about them. I agree with BT that the first could do with some more punch and the shadow brought out a little more.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby dawesy on Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:53 am

I really like the perspective on No.3, how close were you to that wheel? Cool shot.

I agree with an earlier poster that the first one lacks a bit of punch. If you had some spare power in the flash, perhaps you could have stopped down a tad to underexpose the shadow more, and bring out the rider? Don't know if it would have worked in situation, but a stronger shadow would make a more dramatic image I think. I'd also be tempted to try a crop at the line where the bricks meet the concrete, may give an added sense of height.

Cheers.
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby jamesw on Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:23 am

dawesy wrote:I really like the perspective on No.3, how close were you to that wheel? Cool shot.


about an inch off his wheel i'd say. really close!
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby xorl on Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:55 pm

The 2nd image works best for me. Was it taken around Adelaide? I can't place it.

I find the lighting in the 1st image lets it down. Not exactly sure what I'd prefer, other than something different :). Interesting concept tho'..
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby rflower on Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:03 pm

xorl wrote:The 2nd image works best for me. Was it taken around Adelaide? I can't place it.

I looked at this photo, and thought it looked like some of the buildings around Pt Adelaide. It's been a long time since I was down there though ...
Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G
I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower
If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
User avatar
rflower
Member
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne

Postby daniel_r on Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:25 pm

The 1st and 3rd don't really have much that personally draw my attention.

#2 - great!. It's telling the story, showing the urban environment. The colour is delicious too.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby jamesw on Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:25 pm

dawesy wrote:I agree with an earlier poster that the first one lacks a bit of punch. If you had some spare power in the flash, perhaps you could have stopped down a tad to underexpose the shadow more, and bring out the rider?


i agree with the point you are making, however the situation didnt allow for this... two flashes, running at near full power (dont like cranking to full, flash duration goes too long).

i have some other shots i'll share a little later in the week. a full set for a guy that i'm shooting an interview with.

thanks to everyone that's commented, if anyone else has a opinion they'd like to share i'm all ears.
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby petermmc on Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:53 pm

I really like photos of people doing their stuff. These fit well into this category. I like No 3 the best and admire how you actually captured it. You must have been underground. Great work. I like No 2 because of the background as well as the obvious centre image. I reckon No 1 is a clever capture of a difficult jump. It's not a dramatic photo but is a good photo of a well captured manoeuvre.

Well done James.
Nikon & Olympus
User avatar
petermmc
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Figtree, Wollongong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques