Four Weddings No Funeral - Wedding ImagesModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Four Weddings No Funeral - Wedding ImagesHey just completed a run of four weddings, i am stuffed.......
Here are a few....... Cheers Dan
I presume you want C&C on these.
If so.. 1. I like the first - exposure looks pretty good. 2. The second looks flat. To me, if you asked the subjects to stand in one of those pools of sunlight, it may pop more. 3. The leaves at top right are a little distracting. 4. Her pose seems a little masculine or unnatural. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
I like #1. good use of the reflection.
I think you are too far away in #2, and although it looks to be a nice area, the bride and groom get lost in the background. I would have preferred to see a tighter crop , where you can see the detail in the faces of the 2. I agree with Reschsmooth about the leaves in #3, but I do like the colours of the overall shot. Too much dead space in #4 on the left hand side, and the seagull is a bit distracting. I think, I would have preferred to see this shot in a portrait. Once again closer to the subject. I am sure the brides and grooms will be happy with the end result, as we are only seeing such a small sample of the total sets though. Russell
Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflower If you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
Thanks guys .........these are by no means the best shots, just shots i have thrown out there to see what reaction i get, this is the critique section is it not...so i am cool with both your inputs
Dan Last edited by Cre8tivepixels on Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dan,
No.3 is certainly the best one of the lot. It is a more conventional wedding shot, but it will remind the couple of the positive emotions on the day. Alex
I like them all, Dan. I think the clients should be happy.
And I agree that #3 is the pick of the bunch. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
#3 without a doubt.
On #2, yes, the subjects are too far away ... too much foreground (probably related to the subjects being too far away) ... and really, while I like the arrangement with the three trees, I think the couple should be in the gap between either of the pairs of trees, rather than having the middle tree growing from their heads. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
whilst i agree for the most part with #2 i think if the subject was in the pools of sunlight her dress probably would blow out to much, thats just my observation. i would have prefered it if they where standing between 2 tress the middle tree seems to distract me to much, other than that i really like the image.
I quite liked the empty green space in #2 - it caught my eye
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
here's my newbie opinion
Firstly, love the photos. Couple of picky things... it might just be my screen but could the woman's right shoulder in #1 (camera left) have a bit of burning applied to it in PP just to seperate it from the wall behind her a touch better? The two just seem to blend in with each other a little too much for my eye. Also definitely agree with Gary on #2 about placing the couple inbetween 2 of the trees, although the shot is nicely balanced with the 3 trees across the back, the first thing that caught my eye was the 'awkwardness' of where the couple are placed in regard to the centre tree
Hey mate, that was just flash bounced of the roof.....slow shutter speed and extremely steady hand......lol Dan
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|