Big Birds

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Big Birds

Postby ozimax on Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:55 am

I wandered down to the "Agrodome" near Rotorua, which incidentally doesn't seem to be a place where people get agro, but a complex where Kiwis do all wild and wonderful things like flying on top of a giant fan, bungy jumping and other assorted madness. It's not that I'm scared of that sort of stuff, I just don't have the cash. So, I did the next best thing - went next door and started photographing some ostriches. Here's the results:

Image

Image

Image

Image
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby iposiniditos on Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:58 am

great stuff. very sharp, great detail!

what lens?

#4 if i had to choose.
Theodoros Chliapas
www.tchliapas.com

Arf she said...
User avatar
iposiniditos
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:33 am
Location: Kozani, Greece

Postby ATJ on Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:42 am

The second one is my favourite, but they are all good. Lots of detail where it is needed.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby ozimax on Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:58 am

iposiniditos wrote:great stuff. very sharp, great detail!

what lens?


Canon 135mm F2 prime.

Cheers.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby zafra52 on Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:37 pm

I am with Theo. They all have great colour and sharpness, but for composition the 4th is my choice. I can see one needs to have good photographic equipment to produce anything similar.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby ozimax on Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:15 pm

Actually, ostriches are very easy to photograph - they just stand there and gawk at you! Having said that, the 135 F2 is an astonishing lens, the only problem is the focal length on the crop camera. I am always having to back up to get some sort of shot in the frame. This would be the perfect lens on a FF camera.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby JeffGlue on Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:35 pm

Really like the non-conventional composition in #1. Makes the shot more interesting!
JeffGlue
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:04 am
Location: Collinswood, Adelaide

Postby zafra52 on Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:46 am

I only have zoom lenses so my pictures are normally not as sharp as yours and that is why I always sharpen them a bit. I also hate having to change the lens in the camera too often because of the dust. That is why I was thinking of getting the new Sigma 18 - 200 OS for my 30D, but I guesss you pay for the convinience with less sharp images. Dilemas.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Big Birds

Postby mickeyjuice on Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:54 pm

Great quote for these birds :-)

Love the last one - really shows their attitude, I reckon.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Postby ozimax on Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:30 pm

Zafs, it is a dilemma indeed, increased sharpness or less dust. Many photographers carry two bodies and two lenses at all times, but I travel too lightly to even consider that.

As far as dust goes, I am fairly disappointed with the 30D. It has far more problems than my old D70. I found the 70-200 F2.8 also let in a lot of dust, not sure why as it was the only lens I used for months. Now I switch between the 10-22mm and the 135mm and the focal lengths suit me perfectly so I guess I will have to clean the sensor more often.

As far as sharpness is concerned, the 135 F2 is outstanding, not to mention the bokeh and low light capabilities, however, it is not as versatile as the 70-200.

Now, back to the birds again, they are amazing creatures and fun to photograph.

Ozi.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Big V on Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:54 pm

That second one is nice and sharp and so well exposed.
Canon
User avatar
Big V
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2301
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Finch on Wed Oct 31, 2007 6:35 pm

No. 4 is a standout for me, by a mile. We've all seen Ostrich pics before but the angle, sharpness and blue sky in background makes this pic a ripper.

Cheers
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques