Red duck. Sorry.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Red duck. Sorry.Regards
Matt. K
Matt,
This looks a bit soft to me. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Nothing to be sorry here Matt
Lovely perspective, great colours, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
So you should be sorry Matt!
Great colour, texture and a very unusual crop make a very interesting image. Now, here's the question: What did the duck eventually taste like? President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Masterful work Mr K. The tight crop makes this almost abstract. Great colours and another well chosen subject from you.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I love the idea but like many others, first thing I saw was that the duck was soft. Would have been a ripper, otherwise.
Cheers
I'll agree with you all that the duck is a little soft....but the message is...not every image has to be tack sharp! It's well known in professonal portraiture that very sharp lenses can work against the photograph. This can also be true for some landscapes. Sharpness and softness are creative controls. David Hamilton, the famous photographer of very young beautiful sometimes semi-draped girls was rumoured to alway use a Minolta (Rokker?) 50mm lens that had small chips on the front element. It gave him the softness and diffusion that made his style.
Thanks for the comments and feedback. You make me think. Regards
Matt. K
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|