Playing with Flash on flower macros

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Playing with Flash on flower macros

Postby chrisk on Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:48 am

a couple of experiments in flash positioning and exposures. what do you think ?

Image

Image
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:31 am

This is something akin to taking a butt/arse shot. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Nice lighting, the exposures look spot on with nice golden hues.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby chrisk on Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:45 am

i...like....big butts and i can;t deny.
nevermind... :oops:
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:12 pm

I think that they're cool, especially #2.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:23 pm

Just to be different I really like #1. Can you explain a little about your setup you were experimenting with ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Mr Darcy on Fri Nov 02, 2007 4:18 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Just to be different I really like #1. Can you explain a little about your setup you were experimenting with ?


Not so different. Ditto
The subtlety of the colours under the petals is stunning
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Postby chrisk on Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:53 pm

sb800 fired at +2 from top to try and wash out the colour of the flower. it's actually quite a stark pink colour but i wanted the green to be bright and the petals to be as pastelly light as possible.

sb600 with lightbox fired from behind at +3 to try and highlight the little hairs on the petal.

holding a white reflector, (styrofoam), in my mouth :lol: to bounce back the light onto the green base.

f7.1, 1/125s, iso 200. spot meter on green base.

why did i go to so much trouble ? buggered if i know. just trying shit out. :D
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Bubby on Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:02 pm

I like the first one :)
Bubby
Newbie
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Cabarita

Postby zafra52 on Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:04 pm

I prefer number , just don't ask me why. Lovely colour, detail and sharpness.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Mr Darcy on Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:21 pm

zafra52 wrote:I prefer number , just don't ask me why. Lovely colour, detail and sharpness.


Now that's democratic :!: :lol:
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Postby zafra52 on Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:00 pm

Sorry! I prefer number one!
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4827
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques