|
Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
 by norbs on Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:30 pm
Which one is best?
The vege patch is up and running, and the bugs are starting to congregate. Its been blowing a gale, so its damned hard work. #2 was actually on the floor inside.
Exposure: 0.067 sec (1/15) Aperture: f/9 Focal Length: 100 mmISO Speed: 800 Exposure Bias: -1 EV
Exposure: 0.02 sec (1/50) Aperture: f/11 Focal Length: 50 mm ISO Speed: 800 Exposure Bias: -1 EV
Exposure: 0.006 sec (1/160) Aperture: f/11 Focal Length: 100 mm ISO Speed: 800Exposure Bias: -1 EV
Exposure: 0.002 sec (1/500) Aperture: f/5.6 Focal Length: 100 mm ISO Speed: 800 Exposure Bias: -1 EV
Thanks for looking.
-
norbs
- Member
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: -30.940579 144.421865
-
by Biggzie on Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:49 pm
#3 by a nose from #1 with #2 dead last behind #4 ... gee those race calls are catching today
Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
-
Biggzie
- Member
-
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Mt Gambier, SA
-
by Matt. K on Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:18 pm
#1 is a stunner! Very professional!
Regards
Matt. K
-
Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by chrisk on Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:53 pm
#4 is a ripper. nice composition and DOF. the leaf layers and positioning give the shot alot of character. #1 doesn;t look quite in focus to me.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-
chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by SileNceR_RH on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:08 am
I like number four for composition as well, Number one is quite good also.
Realistically, they're all good - well done!
-
SileNceR_RH
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:47 am
- Location: Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
-
by marcotrov on Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:45 pm
#4 is a great image Norbs. The context you have wrapped the fly in makes it all the more interesting.
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by norbs on Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:16 am
Thanks for the comments.
#1 is actually very soft. Its interesting to see people say its good. Maybe they aren't clicking on the photo to look at it large.
-
norbs
- Member
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: -30.940579 144.421865
-
by gasgasgas on Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:44 am
Norbs,
Great photos. I clicked on each first and agree that #1 is soft. The small image looks OK, but for me a better trade off would have been less DoF for more speed. This probably would have sharpened it up a bit.
I actually think #4 is best with an interesting composition (garden scape) and nice and sharp.
I think #3 is a distant second. The composition is great, but to me it's either a little soft of a touch out of focus.
Cheers
Simon Grounds Previously disappointed Nikon user. Now happy to have stuck with it.  Bring on the lotto win for some new Nikon's 
-
gasgasgas
- Member
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:09 pm
- Location: Palm Beach, Gold Coast
by matt-chops on Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:06 pm
I'm a big fan of #4. Maybe a little more DOF though? It looks just a touch to shallow at full res.
Nice shooting.
-
matt-chops
- Member
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: Southside, Brisbane
by Big V on Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:49 pm
Nice colours in shot 3
Canon
-
Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|
