I have posted the original/largely un-adjusted image as well:
I am currently in two minds as to whether I think the pp worked, but this could be based on the monochrome subject.
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Opinions on PPModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Opinions on PP
Further to the photos of my new toy yesterday, can I ask for feedback on this alternate PP on this image. I have tried go for a vintage/aged look. The methodology uses a slightly desaturated look, but the camera itself is basically black and grey.
I have posted the original/largely un-adjusted image as well:
I am currently in two minds as to whether I think the pp worked, but this could be based on the monochrome subject. Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Oh it works for me... I think its a great image that been enhanced nicely through some very clever pp'ing...
 The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
The first one is the better.....love the tones used
Dan
Thanks for the feedback - I have found that the process doesn't work on all subjects.
 Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
