Page 1 of 1

Aotearoa #2

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:47 pm
by stubbsy
A few more images from my recent sojourn on the South Island of our near neighbour. I'd be VERY interested in your comments as to why you do or don't like a particular image and I have a thick skin so fire away - after all this is a critiques area :wink:


Image


Image


Image


Image

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:22 pm
by Bluebell
These are all spectacular images; they make me want to pack my bags and go see for myself. :D
On my monitor they all seem a tiny bit dark.
Also the channel markers (or whatever they are) detract from the unspoiled natural look of the first image.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:30 pm
by Killakoala
Seems to me that no matter where you point your camera, there is a spectacular image to be shot.

Peter, I do feel that you could do with a bit more contrast in your images to get some of that haze darker.

An example of what i mean is in the first image, the really high mountain is very slightly obscured by haze. If you adjust your contrast, it will look clearer. it will greatly enhance the image.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:39 pm
by moz
Overall i like them, you've shot the cliche subjects without it seeming too tired (admittedly I grew up with Craig Potton calendars and the like). The colours do look good.

It looks as though some of the shots were time constrained - the cloud on the Fox, your shooting location for Mitre Peak. The Akaroa shot looks as though there's a lot more foreground contrast than background, and that looks a bit odd to me.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:07 pm
by colin_12
Hey Peter,
The only one that looks out of place to me is #1.
It looks a little over saturated and more blue than normal for you. JMHO.
The others seem great as always.
Regards Colin

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:33 pm
by Handlebars
#2 is beautiful, the odd bit of orange in the fields and background really work with the green and blue sky.

#1 and #4 look as if you have cut the backgrounds from another photo and slotted them in.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:43 pm
by marcotrov
Lovely series peter. #2 and #4 are spectacular. Love the vibrant colours and leading lines in the compositions that contain the eyes within the scene.
I may be wrong but I but i detect a slight colour(cyan?) cast in #1 which is also the least dynamic image for me of the set.
cheers
marco

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:02 am
by matt-chops
Each of those images are stunning. Nicely captured. If I had to pick a winner of the bunch though, it would be #4. Well done. :D

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:48 am
by ozimax
IQ-wise, I like #4 then #2. #2 is classicly NZ green, very similar to the Tarakani region in colour. #1 seems a tad hazy, at least on my monitor. It's a bit hard to critique this image as it has been captured so often by so many photographers.

I like #4 because it's just that bit different, and tack sharp.

Nice set, as always.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:55 am
by PiroStitch
Love the first one though it does seem a bit blue as if the WB was off.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:05 am
by Ant
#1 is pretty much the classic shot for Milford, it has been shot 1000 times and I still love it.
#3 I would like to see a little more in the foreground of the glacier...

Ant.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:12 pm
by blacknstormy
Hey Peter...
I'm not really qualified to comment, but to me these don't grab me as much as your shots usually do :? The first seems way too blue, the second I'm guessing was a hdr??? - close, but the colour seem a little 'off' ... and the 4th .....
was the jetty really there ????? Almost seems as though it was pasted from another shot ????? Or am I going completely crazy ????? :?
Sorry :(
Rel

PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:35 pm
by stubbsy
Thank you all for the great feedback.

#1 is a turkey - I can't believe I got the colours so wrong. Taking on board your comments I have a new version below that I'm happy with (including no more channel markers).

The first 3 images were buggers to process since all had quite strong haze and no amount of playing around was able to fix it to my satisfaction. In large part that's why I posted these here. These images are ones I am NOT (yet) proud of and I was looking for feedback on what others thought.

#2 - this is not an HDR (sorry Rel) - it's just my PP I guess - I added a grad ND to try and cut some of the haze at the top and may have over done it

#3 - As Moz observed time was the issue for this one. The weather was crap the 2 days we were around the glaciers. This shot was taken inside about a 15 minute window with blues sky and relatively little mist. I have more from here to process yet, but the mist (and haze) was very challenging

#4 - I see a few of you feel the jetty is superimposed. It's not - that's the image after PP but I agree it looks fake somehow. IT may just be too strong a contrast between jetty and lake. I've reworked this one too and it's alos shown below.

And a final comment - while I'm as weak as the next man and make the occasional "vanity" post - the real benefit of this area to me is that it's somewhere I can post my almost right shots to get help on making them perfect. So to those who feel reluctant to say what is wrong (or right) with an image I say - do it - every little bit of feedback is useful.

Image

Image