Wedding shots for CritiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wedding shots for CritiqueHi All,
These were taken at my cousins wedding. I was just a guest and made sure I kept right out of the pro's way. Would love your thoughts. #1 #2 #3 Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
So the title under my name is "newbie" - I feel like a special ed kid critiquing a PhD on his quantum-physics lecture.. That being said here's my unwarranted, I've owned a DSLR for two whole months now, never taken a wedding photo in my life before, opinions.. (:
#1 is my favorite but think a bit of fill light would be more flattering. #2 background is a bit pronounced, and although I don't know what would do it (contrast, or something?) the dress could be a bit whiter - looks a bit too blended in tone with her flesh (unlike #1). #3 crop is too narrow for me - too much headroom - I think the bystanders are needed to more appropriately set the scene and wouldn't be distracting. Perhaps groom could be dodged a bit.. HA.. I *so* don't know what I'm talking about but that was fun! ~(: `S
Exposure wise, all 3 are great. I think #2 would benefit from a bit more contrast by adjusting the levels so the couple stands out a bit more but not too much.
Did you take successive shots of #3? The only thing about it is the bride's expression. It's candid, maybe cute but she might be a bit upset about her upturned nose. It's out of your control but usually when someone is walking or laughing, I try to take multiple shots to make the candid shots more pleasing as well. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
This is one of my favourites as well, I love her expression
I'll try a few things and see what happens. I actually desaturated this and then applied a very light red hue to it, that woudl explain the white dress issue. Maybe the tinging doesn't work?
I know... problem is there was a tripod setup in the aisle and as I was also sitting (and only had the one lens) I didn't have much choice but to get the tripod legs in, so I cropped them out and yes, the grooms head is a little blown on top!!! Thanks for the comments Scott, much appreciated. Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
Thanks, I love the S5
I'll give this a go and post the results
Yeah, I see your point. As mentioned I was in a difficult position with this one. I did take a few more but they were not quite as good as this one (I felt). Luckily the bride (my cousin) is used to her little nose and does find it cute Thanks for the comments mate, appreciate them. Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|