Dipodium punctatum - terrestrial orchidModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dipodium punctatum - terrestrial orchidSome shots of a terrestrial orchid, Dipodium punctatum.
Timing was mid day, wind was blowing a gale and plants waving around, and I was trying not to lie in the dirt to take the shot (due to being in good office clothes)(and being in office clothes is what gave me the shites and the need for a drive) and lucky to have the camera in the car. Thus a lot of excuses for some shots not as good as they should be. The flower size is abodt a 10 cent piece. Did have the canon 100mm macro lens on. What could I have done better? Waz whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Gorgeous subject. Orchids always fascinate me. I would have boosted the contrast and brightness a bit to give the images a bit more depth. The first two look a little flat.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
The background is great in the first two. I agree with Steve that you could punch up the contrast a bit - maybe try levels.
The first is the best. A nice simple image with a fair amount of detail. More depth of field would have helped. How was it lit? The second is a little two crowded for me and doesn't have enough separation between the flowers. The third is great for showing the whol spike, but the background and the reeds criss-crossing it are distracting.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|