D3 image of Kings Pier Marina (Cropped)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
D3 image of Kings Pier Marina (Cropped)This is an image of Kings Pier Marina, next to Constitution Dock in Hobart. Most of the larger Sydney Hobart yachts are tied up here.
Taken with D3 and 20/2.8 lens. It was an overcast sky, so I exposed for the sky so as to not blow it. I pretty much used just a quick Shadows/Highlights in CS2 to fix the image up. What I am finding with the D3 is that you can get away with a very underexposed shot and you don't get any horid noise when you correct it. The other thing I've found so far is that the JPG straight out of the camera is bloody good. The NEF had a bit of CA and after a fair bit of PP of the NEF the original JPG was still better. So I threw away the NEF and kept the JPG. The Expeed processor in the camera (and in the D300) seems to do a whole lot better than I can do with PhotoShop and a darn sight quicker as well. This camera is going to dramatically cut down the time I spend on the PC in Photoshop. Cheers John Last edited by johnd on Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
I love the contrasts and the symmetry of this image.
That D3 of yours is singing with your skills. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Beautiful!!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
John,
Seems like you're enjoying your new toy. I suspect that the reflections are a part of what attracted you to the this image, but I'd like to see a crop of this with most of the reflections taken out. I think that would be a very different, but equally attractive, image. And I'd like to see a full size version of this image. This is just so good in the way it's posted here, I'd love to see your raw material. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for the comments guys. I am just so impressed with this camera. the next thing I'll be trying is recording TIFFs. That should give all the detail of the NEFs but with the added bonus of the in camera processing.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
The same image but slighly cropped as suggested. Does it work better than the original?
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
John
I really liked this image when I first saw it but didn't make any me too comments (little value in this case) and was unsure if the suggested crop would work. Now I've seen it I agree - the cropped version is a better take on the scene Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks Peter and LadyBird. Removing those reflected masts certainly makes the image look less busy. Great suggestion Gary.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|