Great Ocean Road Series - 50th AnniversaryModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Great Ocean Road Series - 50th AnniversaryThese were taken over the last weekend of 2007. Would love to have your inputs. Thanks
Thunder Cave - from lower view Thunder Cave - from higher view 12 Apostles Happy New Year to all
I think the 2nd is the best of the 3, seems like you had a good trip.
Ozi[/i] President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
I like the cliff detail in the LHS of the 1st and the RHS of the 2nd.
I understand you took the shots from different places, but have you tried stitching the shots together to make a panorama shot. The perspective might be too different between the shots for this to work, but it's worth a try. Also, with the pano, the cave mouth might end up being too central. If I had to choose one, I'd go for the 2nd. Only thing I don't like so much is the colour of the clouds. maybe take some blue out and desaturate them a bit. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks, folks, for your kind comments and advice.
will look into it when i'm back home. Can't wait leaving for home though as still in a holiday mood! it was a good trip down with a close friend of mine who visited me. johnd, what's LHS and RHS? I'm a noob with these acronyms! would also love to do pano but not sure which program is the best (yet simple to use). any recommendations? thanks again
What Craig said. For panoramas, I use Panorama Factory. From memory I think it costs about $70 or $80 or thereabouts. You can get a free trial of it as a download. Just google panorama factory. Only trouble with the free trial is it puts a Panorama Factory logo right in the middle of your panorama. Good enough though to see if you like the software. If you decide to buy, you pay your money and they email you the codes to unlock the software and get rid of the logo. You can also put together panoramas using Photoshop etc, but I have found Panorama Factory pretty easy to use and produces great results. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Try Hugin,
its free (though it can be harder to set up) and I have had much better results than from Panorama Factory ... http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
For me, I like the third one best The first seems to lack a little in contrast and sharpness on the upper right rocks (upper centre in the second), but I'm guessing that this is just the rocks, and a small image (which I shouldn't peep so close).
I think that some sense of scale could be provided by inclusion of a person or 'standard sized tree', but not necessary. Just what I would have liked to see, particularly as I'm wondering whether the green at the top is just grass, shrubs or actually big trees dwarved by the large size of the rocks. Reminds me of some photographs a friend Angeline showed on smugmug yesterday ---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash Wish list: skill
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|