Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby mickeyjuice on Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:43 pm

G'day all.

First point - 600mm on a 1.6 crop camera is seriously hard work. The focus point slips away really easily - I got plenty of beautiful crisp shots of the crowd on the other side of the ground rather than the batsman or the bowler. (Shot at the WACA during the Twenty20 final between WA & the mighty Bushrangers - the WACA is a BIG ground.)

Anyway, here are some of the shots. You can see the rest, and these ones with a long side of 1600 for better pixel-peeping :-) if you're interested at http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/sets/72157603740024956/ Includes bails flying, examples of less-than-stellar framing when people get bowled, etc :-)

I think I should have upped my ISO to 200 and used a faster shutter speed. Ah well, live and learn.

The great man - AB 100% crop. Shot without the 2xTC.
Image

The rest are with the Sigma 2xTC.

My favourite shot of the day - Ronchi stumps Blizzard
Image

Ronchi standing up

Image

Voges hits out

Image

Anyway, just thought I'd put up some examples from my first real outing with it.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby big pix on Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:11 pm

........ nice work, you have got to love a long lens............ and someone to carry the gear :lol: :lol:
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:28 pm

All good shots. The second one stands out for me as the DOF works perfectly!
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby Travy on Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:04 pm

Nice work :)

the one with the bails off is my pick, just a pity cant see the ball in it but well done :)
User avatar
Travy
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:44 am
Location: Irymple, Vic

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby mickeyjuice on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:08 am

big pix wrote:........ nice work, you have got to love a long lens............ and someone to carry the gear :lol: :lol:


If only! :-) Actually, the Sigma isn't too heavy. Well, to carry. No fun to hand-hold - needs a monopod.

xerubus wrote:All good shots. The second one stands out for me as the DOF works perfectly!


Gotta love the long lens - the DOF gets tiny!

Travy wrote:Nice work :)

the one with the bails off is my pick, just a pity cant see the ball in it but well done :)


That's one of the problems with stumpings - the ball tends to be hidden in the gloves :-)

Thanks guys - I was pretty happy with my first real attempts with it, and also happy with the lens with a a 2xTC on it.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby gstark on Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:56 am

mickeyjuice wrote:I think I should have upped my ISO to 200 and used a faster shutter speed.


I don't think so; what do you think would have been the differences in the outcomes? How do you think that might have improved what you have here? Images 3 and 4 might have had the ball more "stopped in flight", but I'm almost inclined to suggest that slightly slower shutter speed might have helped capture a better sense of movement.

The great man - AB 100% crop


I think you have oversharpened this by a nudge. A very small nudge. Look at the line between AB's chin and his shirt, immediately to the left of the microphone. That is not how it should be.

What aperture was this shot at? You are either not in the lens's sweet spot (in which case your ISO comments might be correct) or you're showing perhaps some softness in the lens: I think that this is evident around AB's eyes, where I would be expecting to see far more detail and acuity than what is evident here. Now, look down arounf the nose and mouth: there is no real detail there at all. FWIW, I'm guessing around f/8 - certainly not wide open - and I'm leaning towards lens softness here. Given that the Fox logo is sharp, as is the suit, this is not an issue of incorrect focus, nor one of lack of DoF.

Anyway, just thought I'd put up some examples from my first real outing with it.


And I think you should be basically happy with these results.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby Suri on Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:26 pm

Good to see someone else attempting the cricket shots.
Interesting to see you are using the 2xTC, with such satisfactory results.
I am into the 2nd half of the season here in Brisbane and have used the same lense but with a 1.4xTC.
This set up gives me 430mm at the long end but still with f4.0, and even then I was only able to obtain fair to OK results up until just before 5.00pm (Qld time). So far I have not been satisfied with anything over 640ISO on the D200 for these pictures.

After having done a number of games at various Brisbane locations, I can report that this lense setup is sweetest at f6.3-5.6 (D200), and in order to stop a ball bowled at pace you need a minimum 1250th second shutter speed.

A D3 with a new 500mm f4.0VR would be my preferred arrangement - but I need the house more!

Website for those interested.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight/cricket&page=1

By the way - how are yours selling?
D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
User avatar
Suri
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: Redlands, Brisbane

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby mickeyjuice on Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:13 pm

gstark wrote:
mickeyjuice wrote:I think I should have upped my ISO to 200 and used a faster shutter speed.

I don't think so; what do you think would have been the differences in the outcomes? How do you think that might have improved what you have here? Images 3 and 4 might have had the ball more "stopped in flight", but I'm almost inclined to suggest that slightly slower shutter speed might have helped capture a better sense of movement.

Yeah, you're probably right. I had a few shots I trashed because I had blur, but that may well have been the camera, with 600mm on a 1.6 crop body. I was thinking that I should get my shutter speed up to compensate, given that 200ISO on the 40D is more than acceptable.

But I agree, I like the bit of ball blur.

The great man - AB 100% crop

I think you have oversharpened this by a nudge. A very small nudge. Look at the line between AB's chin and his shirt, immediately to the left of the microphone. That is not how it should be.

Yeah, agreed. It didn't look as bad as that when doing it in Lightroom on the 24" screen, but it does on the 800px version.

What aperture was this shot at? You are either not in the lens's sweet spot (in which case your ISO comments might be correct) or you're showing perhaps some softness in the lens

That one was shot at f2.8 - I was pretty much just playing with it, just getting used to the feel of it pre-match. I'd agree this isn't the sweet spot - the others were shot at f5.6.

Anyway, just thought I'd put up some examples from my first real outing with it.

And I think you should be basically happy with these results.

For the first time out, I'm rapt.
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby mickeyjuice on Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:21 pm

Suri wrote:By the way - how are yours selling?

Haven't thought about selling them, TBH - that shoot was the Twenty20 final @ the WACA, so I had snappers from the West, AAP and Getty's all within 50 metres. And it was my first real shot at cricket, so I was really just practicing.

We've got daylight savings and we're a lot further south down here, so you can shoot at 100ISO until about 7:30 :-)

I think I took about 1200 shots for the day.

Nice work getting Watto bowled after an innings of that length :-)
cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/
A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
User avatar
mickeyjuice
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:48 am
Location: West Brunswick, Victoria

Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)

Postby Suri on Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:03 pm

Nice work getting Watto bowled after an innings of that length


Thanks for looking Micky.
Yeah - 4 hours in the sun while the man played like he was up for the Aussie Openers spot.
I thought I was going to wear out the delete button.
He only opened up in the last session - but the fireworks was worth the wait though.

Not to mention the sunburn - my ears are still sore.
Don't know about you, but sunscreen and cameras don't mix.
Then there is the back to back cap (Lewton Hewitt style) - at least the neck gets some protection.
D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
User avatar
Suri
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: Redlands, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques