Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)G'day all.
First point - 600mm on a 1.6 crop camera is seriously hard work. The focus point slips away really easily - I got plenty of beautiful crisp shots of the crowd on the other side of the ground rather than the batsman or the bowler. (Shot at the WACA during the Twenty20 final between WA & the mighty Bushrangers - the WACA is a BIG ground.) Anyway, here are some of the shots. You can see the rest, and these ones with a long side of 1600 for better pixel-peeping if you're interested at http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/sets/72157603740024956/ Includes bails flying, examples of less-than-stellar framing when people get bowled, etc I think I should have upped my ISO to 200 and used a faster shutter speed. Ah well, live and learn. The great man - AB 100% crop. Shot without the 2xTC. The rest are with the Sigma 2xTC. My favourite shot of the day - Ronchi stumps Blizzard Ronchi standing up Voges hits out Anyway, just thought I'd put up some examples from my first real outing with it. cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/ A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)........ nice work, you have got to love a long lens............ and someone to carry the gear
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)All good shots. The second one stands out for me as the DOF works perfectly!
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)Nice work
the one with the bails off is my pick, just a pity cant see the ball in it but well done
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)
If only! Actually, the Sigma isn't too heavy. Well, to carry. No fun to hand-hold - needs a monopod.
Gotta love the long lens - the DOF gets tiny!
That's one of the problems with stumpings - the ball tends to be hidden in the gloves Thanks guys - I was pretty happy with my first real attempts with it, and also happy with the lens with a a 2xTC on it. cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/ A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)
I don't think so; what do you think would have been the differences in the outcomes? How do you think that might have improved what you have here? Images 3 and 4 might have had the ball more "stopped in flight", but I'm almost inclined to suggest that slightly slower shutter speed might have helped capture a better sense of movement.
I think you have oversharpened this by a nudge. A very small nudge. Look at the line between AB's chin and his shirt, immediately to the left of the microphone. That is not how it should be. What aperture was this shot at? You are either not in the lens's sweet spot (in which case your ISO comments might be correct) or you're showing perhaps some softness in the lens: I think that this is evident around AB's eyes, where I would be expecting to see far more detail and acuity than what is evident here. Now, look down arounf the nose and mouth: there is no real detail there at all. FWIW, I'm guessing around f/8 - certainly not wide open - and I'm leaning towards lens softness here. Given that the Fox logo is sharp, as is the suit, this is not an issue of incorrect focus, nor one of lack of DoF.
And I think you should be basically happy with these results. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)Good to see someone else attempting the cricket shots.
Interesting to see you are using the 2xTC, with such satisfactory results. I am into the 2nd half of the season here in Brisbane and have used the same lense but with a 1.4xTC. This set up gives me 430mm at the long end but still with f4.0, and even then I was only able to obtain fair to OK results up until just before 5.00pm (Qld time). So far I have not been satisfied with anything over 640ISO on the D200 for these pictures. After having done a number of games at various Brisbane locations, I can report that this lense setup is sweetest at f6.3-5.6 (D200), and in order to stop a ball bowled at pace you need a minimum 1250th second shutter speed. A D3 with a new 500mm f4.0VR would be my preferred arrangement - but I need the house more! Website for those interested. http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight/cricket&page=1 By the way - how are yours selling? D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)
Yeah, you're probably right. I had a few shots I trashed because I had blur, but that may well have been the camera, with 600mm on a 1.6 crop body. I was thinking that I should get my shutter speed up to compensate, given that 200ISO on the 40D is more than acceptable. But I agree, I like the bit of ball blur.
Yeah, agreed. It didn't look as bad as that when doing it in Lightroom on the 24" screen, but it does on the 800px version.
That one was shot at f2.8 - I was pretty much just playing with it, just getting used to the feel of it pre-match. I'd agree this isn't the sweet spot - the others were shot at f5.6.
For the first time out, I'm rapt. cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/ A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)
Haven't thought about selling them, TBH - that shoot was the Twenty20 final @ the WACA, so I had snappers from the West, AAP and Getty's all within 50 metres. And it was my first real shot at cricket, so I was really just practicing. We've got daylight savings and we're a lot further south down here, so you can shoot at 100ISO until about 7:30 I think I took about 1200 shots for the day. Nice work getting Watto bowled after an innings of that length cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/ A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
Re: Shooting cricket with the Sigma 120-300/2.8 (with a 2xTC)
Thanks for looking Micky. Yeah - 4 hours in the sun while the man played like he was up for the Aussie Openers spot. I thought I was going to wear out the delete button. He only opened up in the last session - but the fireworks was worth the wait though. Not to mention the sunburn - my ears are still sore. Don't know about you, but sunscreen and cameras don't mix. Then there is the back to back cap (Lewton Hewitt style) - at least the neck gets some protection. D300, D200, (D70 - now with daughter) and heaps of Nikon stuff.
http://www.pbase.com/steven_hight
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|