Melbourne Dec 2006Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Melbourne Dec 2006I think I may have posted these images before, but I have reworked them slightly, and would be interested in feedback.
Taken on f90x, HP5 with 80-200mm, at 80mm (hence the inappropriate crop on the Herald Sun sign). Thanks for looking Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Melbourne Dec 2006#2 looks like some barren wasteland....
I like it lots...
Re: Melbourne Dec 2006Wasn't it Ava Gardner who said that Melbourne was the right place to make a movie about the end of the world?
And now we have the stills.
Previous topic • Next topic
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|