Back at the trackModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Back at the trackYep the break was good, so now it's time for the fun to begin
Was out @ eastern creek Friday to cover a private test for a race team I sponsor for the 12 hour coming up at bathurst. C&C welcome, Note that i was not i a mood to be all artsy with 1/50s shutters due to the rain (cue harden the **** up ) Cheers!
Re: Back at the trackI think the first one has the most merit here Kyle, the low angle coupled with the high amount of neg camber (wheel turning helps too) gives this some feeling.
The others whilst great shots are nothing spectacular Well executed though. Brett PS Sorry for the harshness but I've decided to be a lot more critical this year for some of you EDIT: And would like the same Be harsh, please!
Re: Back at the trackThe negative camber in the first one gives it a touch of the unusual, but I really prefer the head-on shots, rather than the shots of the tails. Makes you feel as though the action is coming to you rather than heading away - anticipation is better than the feeling of things being over, or something
(Now I've got the new Sigma 120-300, I really need to get myself up to Barbagallo...) cheers, juice
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickeyjuice/ A bunch of Canon stuff (including Canon & Sigma lenses). Way more gear than talent.
Re: Back at the trackThe ute shot ROCKS ... and i like the EVO shot also
Cheers Joe Canon 40D/350d 18-55kit lens...90-300efs lens...17-35 2.8L..70-200 2.8 IS in my bag and now a 580ex2 +50mm1.8
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|