Distant ChildhoodModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: Distant ChildhoodThat's a nice photo Alex, I took a similar photo a few months back with out a child in the view & I felt something was missing, pretty obvious but now I get it
Re: Distant ChildhoodLove the concept Alex but somehow on my monitor the child's face looks a bit too washed out, not blown but yeah...washed out.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Distant ChildhoodThanks for the comments, guys.
Geoff- Agree regarding the exposure on the face. As it was candid, sometimes taking a photo is better than no photo at all. Cheers Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|