can anyone tell me what caused it...
this file was 4,14mb the files either side of it 4,94mb and 5.17mb...
i think i took 3 shots in a burst and this was the last, would this be the reason for it.
thanks
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
high key surferModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
high key surfer
out of about 260 images i took yesterday this happened to 1 of them ....
can anyone tell me what caused it... this file was 4,14mb the files either side of it 4,94mb and 5.17mb... i think i took 3 shots in a burst and this was the last, would this be the reason for it. thanks
Re: high key surfer
The file size difference would be explained by the amount of "white" in shot. Jpeg will optimise the file, not compression, just removal of redundant data. Can't explain the rest though.
D.M. - D200
12°11'34"S 136°46'24"E or there abouts
Re: high key surfer
Pa,
Sure you didn't somehow bracket the exposures, as on my d200 it always leaves the longest exposure untill last, I bet you had one dark shot aswell? Please don't use or edit my images.
D200x2, kit lens, Sigma 105mm f2.8, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, SB600, SB800, Sigma 70-200 f2.8, Sigma 1.4x TC, 2x TC, Sigma 120-300 f2.8
Re: high key surfer
Hi Pa,
Not sure what has happened here, but I have to say that I really like the effect created. It's one of the more interesting surfing photos I've seen and I make a point of looking at lots of them. What lens are you using to shoot surfing these days? Mark
Wetlens
Re: high key surfer
Can't explain it, but it's pretty cool
 Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: high key surfer
Nice result........ now go and do it again.........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Re: high key surfer
Adame it wasn't bracketed....have to fiddle to make it bracket...
Mark I'm still using A Nikon ED AF NIKKOR 300mm F4.... thanks for the comments... i did notice the shutter speed was about half of what i use
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
