Friend's WeddingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Friend's WeddingTried to do the best I could to get out from this but the friend insisted I did his wedding - far from my favourite photography types, but I gave it a shot anyway, was really worried as it's my first attempt at wedding stuff.
Would love to know your opinions. I normally don't like selective colouring, but thought it might work here... Thanks for looking Alex
Re: Friend's WeddingYou did good Alex...
I'd probably straighten the horizon in the first - if you can without losing her dress that is -.. were they looking into the sun by any chance though cause they seem to be squinting a bit... 2nd shot is great very well exposed and I likes the fun pose too.. I'm not a fan of selective colour but its works in the next... for me anyways... the last one looks good also.. although I have to ask if anything has been done to elongate the groomsmens heads?... strange question I know but are their heads really that long?. or did you do something in the pp?.. (okay you may spank me if I have just insulted anyone).. The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
Re: Friend's Weddingelongated head seems to be from lens distortion on the edges.
#2 is the pick for me. http://www.lumensphotography.com
Nikon gear. D3x, D3s, D3 ... and lots of lenses.
Re: Friend's WeddingI think the 3rd groomsman is the fonz.
I like number one - if it wasn't a wedding photo I'd leave as is, otherwise for a formal shot it should prob. be straightened the selective colour doesn't work for me as there isn't enough contrast in the pic to show you have used it, it's easy to miss. I don't know, sharpen and pop the saturation maybe D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Re: Friend's WeddingThanks for your feedback people. There might be a some distortion from the lens in the last one, Bindii. I'll have to check which focal length I was on.
Cheers Alex
Re: Friend's WeddingHi Alex, some nice shots there. And congratulations on your first wedding. Looks like your fashion photography experience has helped in getting some good exposures and poses. The B&G might like the selective desat shot especially if they haven't seen that type of thing before, but IMHO the original is a lot stronger.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Re: Friend's WeddingI like 2,3 & 4. The angles on no1 just don't do it for me....
Looked like a fun shoot..... Portsea? All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
Re: Friend's WeddingI like the last image Well done
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|