Wedding photos

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Wedding photos

Postby who on Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:43 am

This is the first wedding i have tried to photograph (as a guest).

Here are 3 pics I would like critique on. I have my own opinions on them but would like other opinions.

Image
Image
Image
Old D200+extras
who
Senior Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Ulverstone, TAS

Re: Wedding photos

Postby methd on Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:44 pm

If i was shooting bigger brides (and i get some at times), I usually use a wider lens and don't shoot too close. That way, it's more of a landscape photo with the couple in it, rather than the couple (bride) dominating the photo. The other end is to crop really close, as in face and upper chest only and to avoid the arm and mid region of her body.
http://www.lumensphotography.com
Nikon gear. D3x, D3s, D3 ... and lots of lenses.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Re: Wedding photos

Postby barry on Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:57 pm

Who, a couple of crits.

#1 WB is too blue, need to warm it up a bit. Also maybe think about removing dead branch and plastic.

#2 Groom needs to be looking at camera.

#3 Shame flowers are out OOF otherwise a nice candid shot.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
User avatar
barry
Member
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
Location: Emu Plains NSW

Re: Wedding photos

Postby Pehpsi on Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:28 pm

I also agree about getting rid of the branch in #1, which is quite distracting.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Re: Wedding photos

Postby who on Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:38 pm

Thanks all.

I must admit I didn't get into doing much PP - a bit time challenged currently so I didn't attempt the plastic and missed the colours.

#2 was hard as I was a guest rather than the appointed photographer, so I shot more candid as it happened.

#3 - that was a nasty spot to be honest, the lighting was very harsh (a lot of glass roofline) as can be seen by the upper right. The camera went to ISO 400 (top end of my auto ISO range) and f2.8 and I did a lot of tweaking of levels etc to bring out what I have there. Also had no prior planning so every shot was reactive.
Old D200+extras
who
Senior Member
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Ulverstone, TAS

Re: Wedding photos

Postby surenj on Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:19 pm

agree with the others... I find the table really out of place in the natural backdrop...
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Wedding photos

Postby Bindii on Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:51 pm

#1... they are too centred if they were to the right side of the frame a little more it would be more appealing... and whats with the blanket on the ground... I also would have tried to position myself so that their heads were in a clear spot in the background to help them standout a little more... a couple of steps to the right and a little lower vantage point would have done it.. although I suspect thats where the tog was.. (or should of been anyways... )...

#2... That table is just wrong in so many ways... but then again when your shooting a wedding you have t work with you're given.. the shots lovely and sharp.. once again a little too centred for my tastes though... :)

#3... Its not working for me... the angle makes the brides arm appear to be larger than it is.. and the whole bride is unfocussed.. but not enough unfocussed to look deliberate.. still the groom looks happy..

I hope you don't think I have been unfairly harsh.. its not easy shooting as a guest and you have done very well under the circumstances... :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques