Page 1 of 1

Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:44 am
by photohiker
I've hung back from going in to take photos, but it closes on the 31'st, so it was this week or battle the crowds on the weekend.

Someone else mentioned that 11PM is good, so we arrived at about 11:30, but the crowds and other pesky photographers didn't really thin out until about midnight. I took about 100 shots in an hour and a bit. You really have to watch your angles, and the normal lights and bollards etc around the place are painful for some of the buildings.

See what you think:

Image

Image

Image

Image

More here if you are interested.

Comments welcome.

Michael

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:46 pm
by Shorty
Wow that first photo is stunning! Well captured!! :D

Shorty

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:09 pm
by surenj
Nice shots...esp first. Way better and thoughtful than what I took...

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:47 pm
by Catcha
1st, 2nd and 4th are great, the colours are really sharp, what settings did you use ?

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:53 pm
by rcg
I like them all. great composition for what could of easily turned into boring, and plain, building shots

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:47 am
by DebT
Hi,
love the variety of angles and use of fence water etc..
well don
Rgds Deb T

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:41 am
by photohiker
Thanks for the comments!

Catcha, not sure which settings you mean, here is what I did:

The first photo was taken at: 32mm, ASA400, 3 Seconds @f8.

Processed in LightRoom:
    WB (as shot), 4950;
    Exposure -1.67;
    Recovery 31;
    Blacks 5;
    Contrast +25;
    Vibrance and Saturation both +2.
That's it.

The others followed a similar path, just minimal PP to reveal the colours and reduce the blow out of static lighting.
#3 needed more radical steps to save dark areas, but ultimately it's not a great photo.

Interesting to note that wheelie bins ruined a few photos, I think people without tripods drag them around and use them as camera supports.

Michael

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:46 pm
by Catcha
photohiker wrote:Thanks for the comments!

Catcha, not sure which settings you mean, here is what I did:

The first photo was taken at: 32mm, ASA400, 3 Seconds @f8.

Processed in LightRoom:
    WB (as shot), 4950;
    Exposure -1.67;
    Recovery 31;
    Blacks 5;
    Contrast +25;
    Vibrance and Saturation both +2.
That's it.

The others followed a similar path, just minimal PP to reveal the colours and reduce the blow out of static lighting.
#3 needed more radical steps to save dark areas, but ultimately it's not a great photo.

Interesting to note that wheelie bins ruined a few photos, I think people without tripods drag them around and use them as camera supports.

Michael



Thanks thats what I wanted to know :cheers:

Re: Northern Lights, Adelaide. (yes, again!) :)

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:05 pm
by CoryH
Nice shots, I really like the refelction, different angle,Certainly one I didnt think of when I was there..