Bee!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Bee!

Postby andy on Wed May 07, 2008 11:25 am

Okay i did already post this half way down some other post...but here it is again for critique.

So far I've found macro (using reversed 50mm) to be very difficult. I put this shot down mostly to luck combined with the probability that I'd have to get at least one good shot if I fired > 50 shots while the bee was running and buzzing around. This was the only shot worth keeping.

Image

Is the cropping okay? I'm now thinking that perhaps I should remove much of the left section right up to the wing.
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
User avatar
andy
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
Location: Dunlop, Canberra

Re: Bee!

Postby Bindii on Wed May 07, 2008 4:09 pm

This macro lark is not as easy as it looks is it?.. still you've done a good job of it although I feel it could be sharper overall... I'd crop to where you suggested also... :)
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Re: Bee!

Postby andy on Wed May 07, 2008 4:40 pm

Are you referring specifically to the 'reversed 50mm' lark?

I've found it very difficult to get good images with the reversed 50mm. The DOF is so narrow, there's often not enough of it to go around. That being said, I do see potential for capturing some great images. In fact I can't actually remember if I was stopped down to f22 or only close to it. Perhaps I could have squeezed a bit more depth out of it. I might have a hunt around and see what other people have managed with these tools.

Cheers.
D90, 50 mm 1.8, 18-70 mm, Sigma 10-20 mm, SB600
User avatar
andy
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:41 pm
Location: Dunlop, Canberra

Re: Bee!

Postby chrisk on Wed May 07, 2008 6:25 pm

a reversed 50mm is very difficult to use, much harder than a dedicated macro lens. @f22 you are suffering from quite a bit of diffraction which isnt helping your sharpness. i'd be considering using a flash next time round. you'll get much sharper images.

bees are really tough to get right, especially at that focal length. all things considered you did a great job.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: Bee!

Postby greencardigan on Thu May 08, 2008 3:00 pm

When reversing lenses I found reversing a 50mm on the front of another lens (105 or 70-300G) gave ok results.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques