Caught in the RainModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Caught in the RainBit embarrassed by this one. Its actually a film shot, but I don't have a scanner, so I reshot the photograph using the DSLR. I stuffed that up by forgetting it was set to ISO 1600 so a crap reproduction was made even worse by having the wrong ISO. Needless to say, the film prints are significantly better and are far more engaging.
----------------- Camera: Praktica Super TL film: Ilford XP2 400 speed: 1/250th @ f-4
Re: Caught in the RainMan seeing good 'ol photos captured on black and white film brings me back to the days of the dark room.
Nonetheless, considering the step you took to get the photo uploaded, nice photo.
Re: Caught in the RainLike it...
Re: Caught in the RainThanks for the comments guys.
Re: Caught in the RainIt is a shame you don't have a scanner, but nevertheless I would have the negative scanned at the bes/highest possible resolution and keep a digital image of it because it is a great shot.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|