Recreating the cliched shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Recreating the cliched shots

Postby losfp on Sun May 11, 2008 6:01 pm

Here are a couple of baby shots that I've seen floating about that I have tried to replicate for us. I love it when it's black and white and simple - it gives one a LOT of leeway when it comes to WB, exposure etc because you can tailor the look to exactly what you want in PP :)

What do you think? In hindsight I would probably do the first two shots without the nappy, however I was getting sick of being peed on that that stage.. and I thought I would be able to crop it.

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby joet on Sun May 11, 2008 6:10 pm

Des,

Great recreations, even if the nappy is a bit distracting :lol: BTW, Chryssine says that the Greeks think it's good luck to have a baby pee on you :oops: :shock:
Regards

Joe
User avatar
joet
500 posts - only 6 years to go
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: 2/163 Booker Bay Rd, Booker Bay, NSW Nikon D70, D300

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 11, 2008 6:27 pm

Des

#3 is the pick here, but I'm a little distracted by some white flecks in the black which I'd be cloning out. In fact I'd be tempted to clone out the other bits of the surroundings we can see in the dark areas too.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby losfp on Sun May 11, 2008 7:06 pm

Fair call Peter - I noticed them after I exported as well.. My laptop screen doesn't let me see those bits unless I view them at a certain angle.

I have just tweaked the curves in all of these shots to basically crush anything darker than a certain value into black, which was the effect I wanted anyway. Should be better now
Last edited by losfp on Sun May 11, 2008 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby whitey on Sun May 11, 2008 7:23 pm

These are great, wish I had thought to do them when mine were small.

Edit: and re the nappy, I think they would be better shots without them. Understand the reasoning though :D
D80, 50mm F/1.8, 18-70mm DX, Sigma 10-20mm
whitey
Member
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: Paddington, Sydney

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby Pehpsi on Sun May 11, 2008 9:05 pm

Love #1, beautiful work.
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby Yi-P on Sun May 11, 2008 10:19 pm

#1 and #3 for me, but I'd prefer them to be little bit brighter to bring up the life of a photo of a newborn.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby Mitchell on Mon May 12, 2008 8:06 pm

Nice shots- a couple of niggles:

I like the face angle in #1 - eyes square on
and I like the hand position in #2 - curved fingers give softness, the straight fingers of #2 are more harsh,
and I think it better if you don't see the other hand on the left of the frame...
User avatar
Mitchell
Member
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris

Re: Recreating the cliched shots

Postby losfp on Mon May 12, 2008 9:07 pm

Mitchell wrote:Nice shots- a couple of niggles:

I like the face angle in #1 - eyes square on
and I like the hand position in #2 - curved fingers give softness, the straight fingers of #2 are more harsh,
and I think it better if you don't see the other hand on the left of the frame...


I agree totally!!! This is why I posted both :) And I will be trying again later in the week.
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques