Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby MattyO on Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:08 pm

... or is it the other way around?

Here are some pics i had a look at again, and armed with a better understanding of color, contrast and exposure have edited again.

C&C encouraged.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Matty
MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au
http://www.mattyo.com.au

WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography
http://www.circlework.com.au
CAMS Accreditated

D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby gstark on Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:25 pm

Matty,

You may want to add a link back to the original threads where these first appeared, so that those who so desire may compare the before and after variants.

On these, and in particular #s 2 and 3, I think you should pull back on your sharpening; these two look to me to be oversharpened.

Cheers.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby Big Red on Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:41 pm

these look great to me ... but i may be slightly affected by the content. :oops:

#1 really takes my fancy with the pose, composition, colour, and light. 8)
User avatar
Big Red
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2520
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Jacobs Well Qld ... mossie capital of the world

Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby MattyO on Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:45 pm

gary,

what makes you say they are oversharpened? i am unsure if i even applied and sharpening in PP... just good nikon glass ;)
MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au
http://www.mattyo.com.au

WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography
http://www.circlework.com.au
CAMS Accreditated

D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby RDW on Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:46 pm

Oh what fun going back over your 318 posts Matt to find the originals to compare to. I only found 1 and 4 and yes I definitely like the improvement in your processing. As for Gary's comment on oversharpening in 2 & 3, I can't find originals and don't really see too much evidence of oversharpening at the posted size -- though she really does jump off the page. Maybe you just had the DOF absolutely spot on.
I do like the subject though!?!
RDW
Member
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:53 pm
Location: Glen Osmond

Re: Old Edits of New Pictures (NSFW)

Postby gstark on Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:18 pm

MattyO wrote:gary,

what makes you say they are oversharpened? i am unsure if i even applied and sharpening in PP... just good nikon glass ;)


Image two: look at her rh shoulder, from the shoulder blade to where her arm intersects with her back. There is minor evidence of haloing here, as well along the rear section of her right leg, from the buttocks and down, following the rear of her leg as we can see it. The forward section of her right thigh, too, shows evidence of haloing. The inside of her left arm, adjacent to her bra ...

Image three: as well as those similar places, pay paricular attention to the inside of her right leg, just above where it meets the water. There is some very evident haloing here, going pretty well almost all the way along this part of her leg.

What I'm seeing is not Nikon glass artefacts, but coming from somewhere in post, or the in-camera settings are a bit too heavy.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques