Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600My friend and I have just started a long term project to photograph foxes in the wild. Its very early days but the eventual plan is to capture some really nice shots of these animals going about their business. The eventual plan is to remote trigger the camera's and use flashes to get some nice shots but it will all take lots of time and planning. Once we get some good shots it will be nice to look back to the early days to see how far we have come.
More images and full story here Last edited by Richard Peters on Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Although the noise is visible these are still amazing pics considering the conditions and are a testament to the D3, and of course, the photographer. I look forward to seeing more from this interesting project.
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Wow, this is making me want the D3 even more, however I don't think I can justify the expense of it over my D2x.
Nice shots, and the noise, while visible is more than usable. 25600ISO bloody hell. Look forward to seeing some more shots from the series as it progresses . http://indigophoto.net
Nikon D2x :: Nikon D200 Sigma 70-200 f2.8 :: Sigma 15-30 f3.5-4.5 :: Sigma 30 f1.4 Lotsa CF Cards :: Lotsa Legs (tripods & monopods)
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600What a great project I too will follow your progress with intertest.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Nice! Could u see the foxes yourself? or did you use IR goggles?
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Very nice! Is this as it came from the camera, or has it been lightened with post-processing? I guess I'm just wanting to know how dark "dark" really is.
Latch
Nikon F50, D70, D200 ; Nikkor 35-80 D, 18-70 DX, 70-300 G, 50 f1.4D ; Manfrotto 190XproB tripod More about me: http://lachlan.rogers.name Some of my personal favourites: http://www.redbubble.com/people/latch
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Richard what a tremendous project, looking forward to seeing updates. That ISO is just incredible and a great ad for the D3
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Thanks all.
It was much darker than it looks int he photo but the camera picsk up more light than your eye can see. I adjusted the levels in photoshop to show you roughly what it was like with my own eye. However with my own eye there was no real colour to be seen and there was no brightness to the white fur and I couldn't see the catchlight in the eyes. So it was like this but duller.
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Yes it's an impressive camera, but we knew that.
600mm, 1/10 .... Was this on a tripod? I'm impressed either way as there is no sign of motion blur in this image at all. Even giving a tripod some credit, shot discipline is critical and picking a moment of stillness and not concerning the fox enough to bail take some doing. Cool project too, if this is the begining I suspect the end will yield some impressive images!
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600the d3 really is amazing!
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600
They aren't sharp in the slightest at %100. But then as you say, at 1/10 at 600mm you don't expect critical sharpness. When I started shooting all I wanted was record shots and websize is fine for that. I had the lens rested on a beanbag that was laying on a small plank of wood. the wood was slid under the headrest of the front seat and then across to lay on top of the head rest of the back seat with me sitting in the back shooting through the side window. Not ideal conditions but during these early stages we aren't taking any risks in scaring the foxes off.
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600You shouldn't have told me that!!
Sounds like tough shooting conditions and done very well. Looks like you are going to have to go to serious lengths to not scare these guys off, good luck with the rest of the project!
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Richard,
Fantastic pic, foxes are pretty hard to photograph, they don't stay out in the open often. Though, we have one that regularly strolls across our paddocks in broad daylight. They make such wonderful subjects, such a pity they are such an environmental disaster.
Re: Foxes in the dark at ISO 25600Love the almost quizical look on the face of the fox.
but the D3, what can you say. This just shows what cameras have become. It almost makes me scared of how good the D4, or even D5 could be if they keep going like this. The only good thing about that though, is the D3 would drop in price!!! Whats next, Nikon release an all in 1 fisheye, wideangle 50mm prime, that transforms into a 70-200, 300mm 400mm & 600mm, with an option for a teleconveter (but thats extra!!) Canon can keep their 21MP's, i would rather have that!!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|