last night's visitorModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
last night's visitorHi,
I had this visitor last night: comments are very welcome CD
Looks great, but maybe I would have preferred to see the whole beastie accompanied by a close-up / crop of the head...
What is it? What lens etc.? Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Hi Leek,
the insect is a praying mantis. It was about 14 cm long. I used a 70-200mm Nikon VR at 200mm, SB800 flash with 1/500s and f11. The shot was on an angle and quite tricky for that. There wasn't much "substance, real estate" to enlarge the head and I stayed away from posting a complete photo of the insect. I felt that a complete photo would have minimised the detail. On the other hand if I had had a macro lens, the head of the insect could have potentially been superb. Thanks for your response. Cheers CD
thanks for the detail...
Yep... that head is definitely a magical shot - maybe even a crop would do??? It seems to be looking at you quizzically ... and... What do you want from me? Nice shot... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
CD, The insect is 14cm long and you have to use the 70-200VR, about 100 times of the insect to capture it How do you feel? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hi Birddog,
I feel fine, thank you. The fact that I didn't consider the kit lens or the 50mm 1.8 may be related to me having had the the Sigma APO 70-300 macro previously. I may not fully understand what my lenses can do. But you know what ? You can stay at quite a distance with the 70-200. I've had a praying mantis fly at me before and I didn't like the experience. Having said this, I'm open to suggestions. Cheers CD p.s. what macro lense do you recommend ?
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|