Portrait of PatrickModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Portrait of PatrickI got a bit weirded out by doing all this landscape stuff this morning so got Patrick in a shot. Basically a bit of desaturation and curves/level/sharpening treatment.
Comments welcomed; Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Portrait of PatrickGeoff
I'm going to deconstruct your composition here and point out a view truths (My opinion only). First...note that the camera is pointing to right of image frame (Taking a pic of ...what?), and Patrick is looking at the lens. This weakens the image because the viewer is likely to look one way...see nothing of interest...and then look the other. This can break the rhythm for the viewer and weaken the image. Note that the third right portion of the image has nothing of visual interest to contribute to your photo. Wasted pixels. Note that cutting off the elbow or any other limb at the edge of the image space can...but not always does...weaken the composition. In this case I think it does. On the plus side I think you placed the horizon in exactly the correct position for this image. I don't know what sepia conversion method you used but I don't think it improved the image. I would....crop the image, open up the mid-tones and add some grain and noise. I would also desaturate the brown tone and maybe add a little yellow. I will now duck for cover................ Regards
Matt. K
Re: Portrait of PatrickMatt - appreciate the constructive criticism and I will crop and adjust according to your recommendations.
This was more of a quick candid rather than a posed portrait. I definitely agree regarding the crop. Noise? WHAT? Interesting suggestion, how do you think noise (in this photograph) will enhance it? I'm genuinely interested to hear your response. Thanks again for the honest critique..I have a (relatively) hard shell Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Portrait of PatrickNoise can open up the image and give it a lightness of being. It can also add age, mystery and ambiance. Give it a try? However...I have just had a play around with this image in PS and it only slightly benefits from a tad of noise. Perhaps because it's a lo res version. Also, curiously....the more I look at it the more I like it. Go figure!
Regards
Matt. K
Re: Portrait of Patrick
That's what Alicia thinks too...that's even weirder Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Re: Portrait of Patrick
what...are you blind ? you cant see the black panther in the treeline ?!!?!? geoff, i quite like the image. i agree that there are some technical "flaws" to the composition but the eye contact is warm and engaging and can carry the rest. now onto more serious business...looks to me like quite an expensive 17-35 mounted there, your standing on rocks, its a little wet...why the hell isnt your lens hood on patrick ? EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Portrait of Patrick
But obviously it is! Albeit, backwards. By the way, Geoff's lens adds about 25kg to the subject! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|