Some pet photos

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some pet photos

Postby radar on Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:00 pm

Okay, time keeps slipping by but I finally get to post a few images. I had to get a few pet photos of something that I don't normally do. As some of you would know, I'm more of a dog person but here are a couple that I enjoyed doing.

Daisy the Russion Blue. She is a great young cat, only 1 year old. She was having plenty of fun running through the house and this tunnel of hers. Once I get my cloning skills improved, I'll clean up a few bits out of the way.
Image

Bruce the Diamond Python (c)
Image
I call him Bruce but not really sure what his name is. He is a male diamond python, about 1.7 metres long. I did this with my Tamron 90mm. He ended up being about 30cm from the front of the lens as I add the camera on a bean bag. I was glad my friend was holding on to him.

Let me know what you think.

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Re: Some pet photos

Postby Glen on Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:28 pm

Andre, like them both. Would probably like a bit more DOF on Bruce to get his snout (?) in focus but at 1/40th and f10 there is not much you can do. (Or try a D3 and ISO 3200 :lol: )
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Some pet photos

Postby bwhinnen on Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:33 pm

Glen wrote:Andre, like them both. Would probably like a bit more DOF on Bruce to get his snout (?) in focus but at 1/40th and f10 there is not much you can do. (Or try a D3 and ISO 3200 :lol: )


Funny I was thinking the same thing about Bruce :) I do like the narrow DOF though, gives me the impression that his eyes are the dangerous bit (even though I know they aren't)...
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Re: Some pet photos - extra python photo added

Postby radar on Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:38 pm

I must say, a D3 or D700 would have been perfect for this 8) 8)

Anyway, in lacking funds for such a beast, here is a side on photo, does it work better? The position of the body of the snake is not quite as nice in this one, I think.

Image

Let me know what you think,

thanks,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Re: Some pet photos

Postby Glen on Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:36 am

I think I do prefer the second Andre, I must say I found the first a better composition but prefer the greater degree of focus on the second
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Some pet photos

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:53 am

Hi Andre,

You might like to consider cropping a little from the top in the second. This will reduce the amount of the body visible in the background.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Some pet photos

Postby jase80 on Wed Oct 15, 2008 8:28 am

I think Gary hit the nail on the head. It will be a great shot with just a little less going on in the top of frame. Good looking snake.
D90 + 18-55VR + 55-200VR
jase80
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:55 pm
Location: Bondi Beach, Sydney NSW

Re: Some pet photos

Postby Greg B on Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:26 pm

I love the shot of Daisy, well done.

As for Bruce, if you call him Bruce, then that is his name. :)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Re: Some pet photos

Postby ATJ on Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:09 pm

André,

I like the shot of Daisy. I think I would prefer if she was looking the other way (into the space). Either that, or have the blank space on the other side.

For Bruce, I much prefer the second version because of the whole head is sharp. I agree with Gary's crop suggestion, in fact you could probably do top and left and maintain the aspect ratio.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques