DragonflyModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: DragonflyExcellent shots, Colin.
Did you try any shots with the aperture opened a but more to throw the background further out of focus? I try to remember to do that. They often don't work, but they often give me better separation.
Re: DragonflyExcellent shots, you did find a cooperative dragonfly!!
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: DragonflyHey Colin - you did do well
The shots seem just a little dark, but if you have a quick play in PS, (copy and paste the shot, and then set the second layer to 'screen' -this lightens the shot, and then set your opacity and fill to suit your taste), you can really bring out some more of the detail in the dragonfly's face. This will work for your whole body shots also Now get out there and get some more insect shots Hugs' Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Re: Dragonflyexcellent clarity and colour.
great job. EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: DragonflyThanks all,
ATJ, I did start with lower aperture and natural light but I could not get the detail I wanted in the subject. So went in with my tried and true formula for flowers and was fairly pleased. I need to experiment with the new camera some more. Rel, I do think that my monitor could do with some adjustment to get the brightness more accurate. I have noticed that my prints come out a bit darker as well. I hope Damian liked this dragonfly as well. Matt, Yes it does. It is also a great glue for perspex. Regards Colin Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: Dragonfly
is it really dead or alive? I have never seen a dragon fly sitting with their wings down - but then again i ain't seen that many dragon flies! I like the third one - the posture reminds my of the skyhawk trainer aircraft! up close and personal! gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: Dragonfly
You need to get out more. They frequently sit with their wings forward.
Re: Dragonflyhey Col
Next time give him a shave, or is he trying for Movember. Great shots Waz whizzzz, there goes life again.....
But now captured on a Canon 40D with bits http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehill/
Re: DragonflyDefinately alive and lively. It took a deal of patience and several goes at getting up close to get these shots.
Regards Colin Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|