Chrissie candidsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Chrissie candidsCandid portraits are something I don't shoot often so I'd like some feedback on these... cheers.
and when I had drunk too much and was bored...
Re: Chrissie candidsHi Jase,
Some nice shots here... Let me firstly say that I think the best of this series is no. 3 - why? Eye contact. Whilst you have eye contact in the first one, the focus (to me) seems pretty soft (especially round the eyes where I think it should be the sharpest)...Some gentle post processing of these images could bring them up nicely I think. Exposure on no.1 is spot on, no blown highlights and an image that will be great to bring out at her 21st! Hehe. The 2nd image is my least favourite - your subject looks dis interested and distracted, perhaps that's what you were aiming for, and as you say - it IS a candid however she looks borderline pissed off. I don't think the lighting helps this either as it's quite bright on her left sife and drops off on the right. Again, to me - this image is soft (not as much as the first one though). The third image is great - cheeky, fun and has a pensive element to it, which I think is a great characteristic of a good candid shot. Eye contact is lovely, but again - I think it could do with some sharpening. No.4 - sorry..but this holds little/no interest to me...a pepper grinder and some nuts....whatever is under the bowl of nuts is also pretty distracting. I think this image has some nice DOF usage but that's about it..I'm guessing your focus point was the pepper grinder but again, I find it a little on the soft side. Hope you find these comments helpful. Thanks for sharing them with us Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|