Boring Opera House shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Boring Opera House shotsi'm continuing my landscape journey with moderate success. i still dont have the knack for understanding how to compose shots properly and i hope tht comes with practice...but it was a good learning experience all the same. the main thing i'm leanring is how to adjust for shooting still life....you need patience and you need to take your time in thinking about the shot before you take it.
i had a perfect sky, very little wind to note, thebest lens' nikon has to offer, pretty good even light but my competance as a landscape photographer wasnt up to the task and i couldnt take full advantage of it. the 3 P's Chris...the 3 P's... so after some frustration, i went back to some things i like taking best. here's an improvised bug shot... and some birdies... EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Boring Opera House shotsI like the Alfa shot. The first and the last seem a touch warm and the two OH shots look a little dark. Bearing in mind I am looking at this on a crappy work monitor which has about 15 colours.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: Boring Opera House shotsPat, they are all shot in cloudy WB. i didnt really pay any attention to the PP cos i'm trying to get my compositions right first. when i actually take a shot i like alot, i'll spend some time in post. no amount of PP on earth will fix the lazy, unimaginative composition of the OH shots. i freakin suck.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
Re: Boring Opera House shotsChris,
Crop about 50% of the sky from the top of the first image, turning it into a pano crop. The Alfa shot is good, but of course you're talking to somebody who knows Alfas somewhat better than most, having owned about 15 of them over the years. You do realise that "Alfa" is actually "ALFA", a FLA, don't you? Perhaps I should revert to using my Alfa avatar? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: Boring Opera House shotsThe ALFA shot is really good!!! Keep at it with the landscapes, you will get there someday.
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42 Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
Re: Boring Opera House shotsAgreed. The Alfa shot is spot on!
I am not very confident with post-processing, so please feel free to edit and repost.
Nikon D80 * 18-200VR * 50/1.8 * Nikon FTn * 50/2.0 70-210/4.5-5.6 * 90-230/4.5 * 200/3.5 * 135/2.8
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|