Bathing Charlie

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Bathing Charlie

Postby Darxtorm on Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:21 pm

Today was a scorcher down here in Melbourne. Charlie was feeling the heat so I offered him a bath. Unfortunately my flash batteries were low so I only got to fire off a half dozen before they died. Trying to get as much use out of it before I have to return it to its rightful owner :?

Please C&C... He's one of my favourite subjects, but can be incredibly difficult to capture.

Image
This is him mid-splash
Image
This is him post-splash PS - I know pet pictures are generally scoffed at, but I couldn't resist these ones :)
I am not very confident with post-processing, so please feel free to edit and repost.
Nikon D80 * 18-200VR * 50/1.8 * Nikon FTn * 50/2.0
70-210/4.5-5.6 * 90-230/4.5 * 200/3.5 * 135/2.8
User avatar
Darxtorm
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:43 am
Location: Melbourne CBD

Re: Bathing Charlie

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:22 am

While these appear to be snap shots, I'd say these suffer from distracting background elements and would next time try to remove or compose the shot to avoid detracting from the main subject, who's cute. I'm not sure if its my uncalibrated screen but these look a too warm to me, could just be the brick and red plate, but I'd get someone with calibrated screen to give their opinion on if the WB is where is should be at.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: Bathing Charlie

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:45 am

A great subject with a big 'cute' factor. On my monitor the images appear to be too dark....I suspect they might be about 1 or 2 stops under exposed which would explain why they look a little muddy. This would also explain the slight colour shift. It may have been your flash not working properly?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: Bathing Charlie

Postby Ant on Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:59 pm

I think if my cats saw these they would complain that their dinner is undercooked! :evil:

Great concept though.

Ant.
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
User avatar
Ant
Member
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques