Page 1 of 1
Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:56 am
by wazonthehill2
Here are a couple of shots from after the sunset last night.
The question I pose is what is peoples preference, the short exposure, capturing the short half second exposure with "sharp" detail, water ripples etc, or the longer exposure of say 30 seconds that gives the soft smoky water effect
Also these are the jpegs from the camera, if i was to post process the raw(in CS3) what would you suggest I do?
and yes I know I need to learn to hold the camera straight!
larger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/larger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/larger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... otostream/larger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wazonthehi ... 8/sizes/l/
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:07 am
by whitey
I am a long and smokey fan. Love longer exposure over water at sunrise/set
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:18 am
by Big Red
i prefer 4 and 2
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:00 pm
by Yi-P
Short and sharp for me, has more feeling of water than just a mist of clouds.
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:25 pm
by stubbsy
Waz
I'm with Shane - images 2 and 4
The point here is there is no right approach. It's all about the image - one is a long exposure and one is short, but the results are stronger images because of the other elements in the shot - #2 because the floats are really well defined, but we still have a hint of ripple in the water, #4 because it makes better use of leading lines with the row of floats drawing the eye to the small jetty, but you've still got that silky water.
As an aside - where did you take these? Is it Lion's Park at Belmont?
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 3:57 pm
by wazonthehill2
Stubbsy
This is the wharf opposite the dunnies near the intersection of Maude and Brooks st (sort of behind Coles Belmont)
look north and you see the 16 footers (lights on left below)
look south and you see the yachet club.
See if the google map works, location is pin 1.
http://maps.google.com.au/maps/ms?clien ... 1eb73dd40cGreat part of the world ain't it!!
Waz
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 4:23 pm
by stubbsy
Cool - thanks Waz. Thought that was the spot - I have taken sunset shots from there before but didn't recall a line of floats running from there out to the platform
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:06 pm
by colin_12
Hey Waz,
I dont really like 1 or 2. But for the question asked I prefer the water in 2 but not the movement in the boat.
I do however really like 3 and 4. These are both great.
I would encourage you to keep taking the long and the short. The rflections are better in 3 and the floats stand out well in 4. You also dont notice the boat in 4 as much.
Re: Short & sharp or long & smoky?
Posted:
Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:06 pm
by lightning
I like 3 & 4 because of the composition