Page 1 of 1

Local thief

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:24 pm
by J.Davis
This bloke hangs around the lunch tables at our flying field looking for a free feed.

Image

Image

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:33 am
by shakey
Looks like he has "attitude". I just wonder whether these are a tad oversharpened, a bit of a halo efffect evident.
We have a few magpies who come up on our back verandah. They have come to an arrangement with our pet dogs about "sharing" the dog food.

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:55 am
by gstark
shakey wrote: I just wonder whether these are a tad oversharpened, a bit of a halo efffect evident.


:agree:

And the WB seems to be off as well. AWB ?

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:54 am
by ATJ
Nice shots. The nits I have are:
* the eyes don't seem sharp. Were you using AF and if so, was the focus point on the eyes?
* Some of the highlights are blown

gstark wrote:And the WB seems to be off as well. AWB ?

Not according to the Exif:
Exif wrote:Manual white balance

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:38 am
by gstark
ATJ wrote:
gstark wrote:And the WB seems to be off as well. AWB ?

Not according to the Exif:
Exif wrote:Manual white balance


In which case, I suspect that it's off. Sunlight WB, shot in open shade, perhaps?

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:34 am
by scott s
i thought of something else when I read the thread title " local thief"

Image

oh, and the grass looks a little blown out. maybe cool the WB a tad and see what happens ?

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:17 pm
by J.Davis
I have trouble with fine focus points as the focus point in the viewfinder encompasses the whole head of the bird, yes auto sharpen and wb was sunlight but bird is in light shadow - good advise - still learning.

Re: Local thief

PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:18 pm
by gstark
J.Davis wrote: wb was sunlight but bird is in light shadow - good advise - still learning.


John,

If you shot in raw, you should be able to correct this fairly easily.