B&W's Stockton BeachModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
B&W's Stockton BeachHi All,
Here are 2 shots taken on an extremely windy day on Stockton Beach. I shot these on raw and converted them to b&w via photoshop. All feedback welcome. Cheers, Colin.
Re: B&W's Stockton Beach#2 for sure! It's great. very abstract but that's what makes it great. It's simple and a great study of light and texture. The sky is great as well. Love it.
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachWow mate, good job! I actually prefer #1--you can't tell where the dunes and the sky meet. I was wanting to go shoot Stockton, now I'm DEFINITELY going to!
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachI Like number 2, maybe alittle more sky though??
gerry's photography journey
No amount of processing will fix bad composition - trust me i have tried.
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachI would like to see the contrast bumped in these. At the moment they look way too flat, and to me, they lack punch and impact.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachStockton beach is a great place to shoot great landscapes.
When processing Black and White landscapes such as these, it's usually beneficial to have deep blacks and bright whites, with an even representation of greys. This link on tonality may be of use.
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachThank you all for your comments. Very much appreciated.
Cheers, Colin.
Re: B&W's Stockton BeachSimply playng with Curves in Photoshop on #1 gives it a lot more punch (although you can easily do it via sliders in your RAW processor).
But a word of warning: your JPEG files are in AdobeRGB, not sRGB. Thus web audiences are unlikely to see what you intended. For B&W images the difference is slight, but there is still a difference. You're using CS3 on Windows: just make sure you convert the image to sRGB as the penultimate step before saving the output web file.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|