mixed bag

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

mixed bag

Postby colin_12 on Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:33 pm

Here are a few that i would like critique upon.

Image
Blow fly

Image
sun burst

Image model ship
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: mixed bag

Postby FrankieP on Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:03 pm

Good God. That is incredibly clear and I like that the background is almost wholly absent without being flat (is it fly screen?), there's nothing but fly there, it's a perfect close up. In fact that fly is far clearer than an image of a blowfly EVER should be, it's given me involuntary shudders.. I'm repulsed but can't.. look.. away..! :shock:

Gazing upon your beautiful cloud shot with the God rays bursting forth after seeing that fly is such a relief for the eyes! A lovely shot but maybe sharper focus on the trees in the foreground and more contrast might give it more punch as it's all very soft. Those rays though, they're fantastic, what a neat sunrise to witness.

Love the glossiness and clarity of the water in the last one, and the lighting looks great. It's a nice angle in both ways to capture the model.
Have: Nikon D90.. Nikkor AF-S 18-200mm VRII, Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G, Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Tokina AT-X 116 11-16mm f/2.8, Tokina AT-X M100 100mm f/2.8 Macro.. Manfrotto 732CY & 484RC2, SB-600, Think Tank gear..
Next: Nikkor AF 35mm f/1.8G, Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Flash..
User avatar
FrankieP
Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:51 pm
Location: Charleville, SW Qld outback, slightly west of the middle of nowhere..

Re: mixed bag

Postby chrisk on Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:15 pm

#1 is outstanding. id like to know more about the lighting please.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Re: mixed bag

Postby Geoff on Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:36 pm

I love the first one here too.
Looking closely at the fly, and it's 'nose' area (I don't even know if flies have noses!) but it looks like a 'pig' fly...check it out..hehehe.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Re: mixed bag

Postby MATT on Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:53 pm

The fly looks like he's whistling... :lol:

I like the second image.. Would be nice on a card.

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Re: mixed bag

Postby ATJ on Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:56 pm

Three great shots, Colin.

I like the low angle on the blow fly. You have used the DOF well to keep the fly sharp but still have a nice out-of-focus background. The only area of improvement that I could suggest would be a greater contrast between the fly and the background. With the dark background, the legs are almost lost.

The sunburst is stunning. It could perhaps be a tad lighter.

The model ship doesn't look like a model at first. How large was it? Typically, the water gives away the scale but somehow you have managed a choppiness that looks almost to scale as the boat. The wide DOF helps, too.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: mixed bag

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:16 pm

#1 I like the lighting & clarity. but I find the wings being edge on a little offputting. I'd like to see some of the wing. A slightly different angle perhaps.

#2 Noice

#3 Looks like a model. Detail is lost against the water. Also the "waves" help destroy the illusion that it is real.
Maybe a shot from much lower down against the sky. rather than the "Aerial" shot you have taken.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: mixed bag

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:27 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:#3 Looks like a model.


The technical explanation for that optical illusion is that it is a...

colin_12 wrote:model ship
:D :D

Seriously, whilst the fly shot is great, I like No. 2 the best as you have managed to capture detail in both the clouds/sky and foreground. The composition is nice as well.
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: mixed bag

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:49 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:#3 Looks like a model.



The technical explanation for that optical illusion is that it is a...

colin_12 wrote:model ship



I knew that. Honest. My point was that people who photograph models usually like to make them look "real" (except the female variety, then they are made to look as unreal as possible :lol: ) If this was Colin's intention, he failed, for me at least, though ATJ's comment indicates he succeeded for others.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: mixed bag

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:02 pm

Mr Darcy wrote:I knew that. Honest. My point was that people who photograph models usually like to make them look "real" (except the female variety, then they are made to look as unreal as possible :lol: ) If this was Colin's intention, he failed, for me at least, though ATJ's comment indicates he succeeded for others.


Corrected, I stand. :)
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Re: mixed bag

Postby Matt. K on Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:14 pm

WOW! The fly is outstanding! A seller! The sky scape is excellent and a notch above the usual ones we get here. The model lship acks sharpness but the water appears to be sharp. I'm still thinking about that one! :shock: :shock: :shock:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Re: mixed bag

Postby Glen on Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:05 pm

Colin that fly is very impressive :D
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: mixed bag

Postby colin_12 on Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:17 pm

Thanks for the feed back.
The lighting for the fly was an sb600 with home made softbox. (see ATJ's web page)
The background is the shadecloth from my bush house.
#2 is an experiment on what I could get out of a very ordinary shot. The foreground was almost black and the rest was pretty washed out.
The model was about 4 feet long. I would have needed wellies to get a lower angle. In the full shot it is very obviously a model.
Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Re: mixed bag

Postby Mr Darcy on Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:07 am

I would have needed wellies to get a lower angle.

I can lend you a pair :lol:
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques